History of Spanish Literature, vol. 1 (of 3)Ticknor, George
History
History of Spanish Literature, vol. 1 (of 3)
Ticknor, George
Spanish literature -- History and criticism
[423] Rojas states these facts in his prefatory anonymous letter,
already mentioned, and entitled “El Autor á un su Amigo”; and he
declares his own name and authorship in an acrostic, called “El
Autor excusando su Obra,” which immediately follows the epistle,
and the initial letters of which bring out the following words:
“El Bachiller Fernando de Rojas acabó la comedia de Calysto y
Meliboea, y fue nascido en la puebla de Montalvan.” Of course, if
we believe Rojas himself, there can be no doubt on this point.
[424] Blanco White, in a criticism on the Celestina, (Variedades,
Tom. I. pp. 224, 296,) expresses this opinion, which is
also found in the Preface to M. Germond de Lavigne’s French
translation of the Celestina. L. F. Moratin, too, (Obras, Tom. I.
Parte I. p. 88,) thinks there is no difference in style between
the two parts, though he treats them as the work of different
writers. But the acute author of the “Diálogo de las Lenguas”
(Mayans y Siscar, Orígenes, Madrid, 1737, 12mo, Tom. II. p. 165)
is of a different opinion, and so is Lampillas, Ensayo, Madrid,
1789, 4to, Tom. VI. p. 54.
But this is not the account given by Rojas himself. He says that he
found the first act already written; and he begins the second with the
impatience of Calisto, in urging Celestina to obtain access to the
high-born and high-bred Melibœa. The low and vulgar woman succeeds, by
presenting herself at the house of Melibœa’s father with lady-like
trifles to sell, and, having once obtained an entrance, easily finds
the means of establishing her right to return. Intrigues of the
grossest kind amongst the servants and subordinates follow; and the
machinations and contrivances of the mover of the whole mischief
advance through the midst of them with great rapidity,--all managed
by herself, and all contributing to her power and purposes. Nothing,
indeed, seems to be beyond the reach of her unprincipled activity
and talent. She talks like a saint or a philosopher, as it suits her
purpose. She flatters; she threatens; she overawes; her unscrupulous
ingenuity is never at fault; her main object is never forgotten or
overlooked.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account