History of Spanish Literature, vol. 3 (of 3)Ticknor, George
History
History of Spanish Literature, vol. 3 (of 3)
Ticknor, George
Spanish literature -- History and criticism
[211] Antonio, Bib. Nov., Tom. II. p. 255. La Mothe le Vayer,
in a discourse addressed to Cardinal Mazarin, (Œuvres, Paris,
1662, folio, Tom. I. pp. 225, etc.,) assails Sandoval furiously,
and sometimes successfully, for his credulity, superstition,
flattery, etc., not forgetting his style. It was a part of the
warfare of France against Spain.
After this, no important and connected work on the history of Spain,
that falls within the domain of elegant literature, appeared for a long
period.[212] Portions of Spanish history, and portions of the history
of Spanish discovery and conquest in the East and the West, were indeed
published from time to time, but the official chroniclers of the crowns
of Castile and Aragon no longer felt themselves bound to go on with
the great works of their predecessors, and the decaying spirit of the
monarchy made no earnest demands on others to tread in their steps.
Some, however, of these historians of the outposts of an empire which
now extended round the globe, and some of the accounts of isolated
events in its annals at home, should be noticed.
[212] During this period, embracing a large part of the
seventeenth century, two remarkable controversies took place
in Spain, which, by introducing a more critical caution into
historical composition, were not without their effect on Mariana,
and may have tended to diminish the number of his successors, by
subjecting history, in all its forms, to more rigorous rules. The
discussions referred to arose in consequence of two extraordinary
forgeries, which, for a time, created a great sensation
throughout the country, and deluded not a few intelligent men and
honest scholars.
The first related to certain metallic plates, sometimes called
“The Leaden Books,” which, having been prepared and buried for
the purpose several years before, were disinterred near Granada
between 1588 and 1595, and, when deciphered, seemed to offer
materials for defending the favorite doctrine of the Spanish
Church on the Immaculate Conception, and for establishing the
great corner-stone of Spanish ecclesiastical history, the coming
to Spain of the Apostle James, the patron saint of the country.
This gross forgery was received for authentic history by Philip
II., Philip III., and Philip IV., each of whom, in a council of
state, consisting of the principal personages of the kingdom,
solemnly adjudged it to be true; so that, at one period of the
discussion, some persons believed the “Leaden Books” would
be admitted into the Canon of the Scriptures. The question,
however, was in time settled at Rome, and they were decided, by
the highest tribunal of the Church, to be false and forged; a
decision in which Spain soon acquiesced.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account