History of Spanish Literature, vol. 3 (of 3)Ticknor, George
History
History of Spanish Literature, vol. 3 (of 3)
Ticknor, George
Spanish literature -- History and criticism
The attempt was by no means a new one. The rules and doctrines of the
ancients, in matters of taste and rhetoric, had frequently before been
announced and defended in Spain. Even Enzina, the oldest of those who
regarded Castilian poetry as an art, was not ignorant of Quintilian and
Cicero, though, in his short treatise, which shows more good sense and
good taste than can be claimed from the age, he takes substantially
the same view of his subject that the Marquis of Villena and the
Provençals had taken before him,--considering all poetry chiefly with
reference to its mechanical forms.[297] Rengifo, a teacher of grammar
and rhetoric, whose “Spanish Art of Poetry” dates from 1592, confines
himself almost entirely to the structure of the verse and the technical
forms known both to the elder Castilian style of composition and to
the Italian introduced by Boscan;--a curious discussion, in which the
authority of the ancients is by no means forgotten, but one whose chief
value consists in what it contains relating to the national school and
its peculiar measures.[298]
[297] It is prefixed to the edition of Enzina’s Cancionero, 1496,
folio, and, I suppose, to the other editions; and fills nine
short chapters.
[298] “Arte Poética Española, su Autor Juan Diaz Rengifo,”
Salamanca, 1592, 4to, enlarged, but not improved, in the editions
of 1700, 1737, etc., by Joseph Vicens.
Alonso Lopez, commonly called El Pinciano,--the same person who
wrote the dull epic on Pelayo,--went further, and in 1596 published
his “Ancient Poetical Philosophy,” in which, under the disguise of
a friendly correspondence, he gives, with much learning and some
acuteness, his own views of the opinions of the ancient masters on
all the modes of poetical composition.[299] Cascales followed him, in
1616, with a series of dialogues, somewhat more familiar than the grave
letters of Lopez, and resting more on the doctrines of Horace, whose
epistle to the Pisos he afterwards published, with a well-written Latin
commentary.[300] Salas, on the contrary, in his “New Idea of Ancient
Tragedy,” which appeared in 1633, followed Aristotle rather than any
other authority, and illustrated his discussion--which is the ablest
in Spanish literature on the side it sustains--by a translation of the
“Trojanæ” of Seneca, and an address of the theatre of all ages to its
various audiences.[301]
[299] “Philosophía Antigua Poética del Doctor Alonso Lopez
Pinciano, Médico Cesareo,” Madrid, 1596, 4to.
[300] “Tablas Poéticas del Licenciado Francisco Cascales,” 1616.
An edition of Madrid, 1779, 8vo, contains a Life of the author
by Mayans y Siscar. Cascales is presumptuous enough to rearrange
Horace’s “Ars Poetica” in what he regards as a better order.
[301] “Nueva Idea de la Tragedia Antigua, ó Illustracion Ultima
al libro Singular de Poética de Aristóteles, por Don Jusepe Ant.
Gonçalez de Salas,” Madrid, 1633, 4to.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account