History of Spanish Literature, vol. 3 (of 3)Ticknor, George
History
History of Spanish Literature, vol. 3 (of 3)
Ticknor, George
Spanish literature -- History and criticism
[334] The works alluded to are,--“El Mercurio General,” (Madrid,
1784, 18mo,) being extracts from accounts claimed to have been
written by Father Isla for that journal, in 1758, of the European
events of the year, but not certainly his;--“Cartas de Juan de la
Enzina,” (Madrid, 1784, 18mo,) a satirical work on the follies of
Spanish medicine;--“Cartas Familiares,” written between 1744 and
1781; published, 1785-86, also in a second edition, Madrid, 1790,
6 tom. 12mo;--“Coleccion de Papeles Crítico-Apologéticos,” (1788,
2 tom. 18mo,) in defence of Feyjoó;--“Sermones,” Madrid, 1792, 6
tom. 8vo;--“Rebusco,” etc., (Madrid, 1790, 18mo,) a collection
of miscellanies, some of which are probably not by Father
Isla;--“Los Aldeanos Críticos”; again in defence of Feyjoó;--and
various papers in the Seminario Erudito, Tom. XVI., XX., and
XXXIV., and in the supplementary volume of the “Fray Gerundio.”
A poem, entitled “Sueño Político,” (Madrid, 1785, 18mo,) on the
accession of Charles III., is also attributed to him; and so are
“Cartas atrasadas del Parnaso,” a satire which is not supposed to
have been written by him, though it reminds one sometimes of the
“Ciceron.”
But what most surprised the world was his translation of “Gil Blas,”
printed in 1787, claiming the work, on which the fame of Le Sage must
always principally rest, as “stolen from the Spanish, and now,” in the
words of Father Isla’s title-page, “restored to its country and native
language by a Spaniard, who does not choose to have his nation trifled
with.”[335] The external grounds for this extraordinary charge are
slight. The first suggestion occurs in 1752, and is made by Voltaire,
who, in his “Age of Louis the Fourteenth,” declares the Gil Blas “to
be entirely taken from Espinel’s ‘Marcos de Obregon.’” This charge,
as we have seen, is not true, and we have reason to believe that it
was the result of personal ill-will on the part of Voltaire, who had
himself been attacked in the Gil Blas, and who had, in some way or
other, heard that Le Sage was indebted to Espinel. Afterwards, similar
declarations are made in two or three books of no authority, and
especially in a Biographical Dictionary printed at Amsterdam in 1771.
But this is all.
[335] “Aventuras de Gil Blas de Santillana, robadas á España,
adoptadas en Francia por Mons. Le Sage, restituidas á su Patria
y á su Lengua nativa, por un Español zeloso, que no sufre que se
burlen de su Nacion,” Madrid, 1787, 6 tom. 8vo, and often since.
Though in great poverty himself, Isla gave any profit that might
come from his version of the Gil Blas to assist a poor Spanish
knight.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account