History of Taxation in Rhode Island to the Year 1790Gardner, Henry B. (Henry Brayton)
History
History of Taxation in Rhode Island to the Year 1790
Gardner, Henry B. (Henry Brayton)
Taxation -- Rhode Island -- History
R.I. Col. Recs. I, 87: This is the first statement (if we except the
payment according to allotments ordered at Portsmouth, which was
repealed. See above Note 10.) which we find of a principle that could
serve as a basis of taxation. Another entry which might point either
to payments for lands or taxes is "It is ordered that such as shall
bring in their acquittances from the Treasury to the Judge and Elders
shall have their Lands recorded." (ib. p. 99). That payments for land
were required would seem clear from an order of the General Court of
the inhabitants of Portsmouth and Newport, after the union of the two
towns, directing the "Treasurer to make demands for all such monies as
are due to the Treasurers for the Lands assigned forth to particular
men." (ib. 103)
Footnote 13:
R.I. Col. Recs. I, 122: The order directs "that the three shillings a
day allowance be taken off from the Officers." The "Officers" might
imply that all offices were paid, but there has been no mention of
payment except to the secretary and sergeant. It is not unlikely that
the magistrates received fees in their judicial capacity.
Footnote 14:
A committee appointed to examine and balance the accounts of the
treasurers reported that £111, 3s. 4d. was due from the treasury of
Newport. The frequent examinations of accounts which are ordered also
show that financial matters are increasing in importance.
Footnote 15:
R.I. Col. Recs. I, 125.
Footnote 16:
This interruption was caused by William Coddington, a citizen of
Newport, who obtained from the Council of State in England a grant to
govern the islands of Rhode Island and Conanicut, with a council of
six men named by the people and approved by himself. The grant was
repealed in Oct. 1652, but mutual jealousies kept the towns apart till
the date given.
Footnote 17:
Government under the Patent was marked by extreme decentralization. At
first all legislative powers remained with the freemen of the towns;
the committee could merely propose measures and declare the decisions
reached by the freemen. The committee, however, tended to become the
legislative body and was regularly established as such on the
resumption of the government in 1654. (R.I. Col. Recs. I, 276 et seq.)
Footnote 18:
No solicitor was elected after 1684.
Footnote 19:
This continued until 1747. Arnold Hist. of R.I. II, 157.
Footnote 20:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account