History of the Conquest of Mexico; vol. 4/4Prescott, William Hickling
History
History of the Conquest of Mexico; vol. 4/4
Prescott, William Hickling
Cortés, Hernán, 1485-1547; Mexico -- History -- Conquest, 1519-1540
His own wife, Doña Catalina Xuarez, was among those who came over from
the Islands to New Spain. According to Bernal Diaz, her coming gave him
no particular satisfaction.[173] It is possible; since his marriage with
her seems to have been entered into with reluctance, and her lowly
condition and connections stood somewhat in the way of his future
advancement. Yet they lived happily together for several years,
according to the testimony of Las Casas;[174] and, whatever he may have
felt, he had the generosity, or the prudence, not to betray his feelings
to the world. On landing, Doña Catalina was escorted by Sandoval to the
capital, where she was kindly received by her husband, and all the
respect paid to her to which she was entitled by her elevated rank. But
the climate of the table-land was not suited to her constitution, and
she died in three months after her arrival.[175] An event so auspicious
to his worldly prospects did not fail, as we shall see hereafter, to
provoke the tongue of scandal to the most malicious, but, it is scarcely
necessary to say, unfounded, inferences.
In the distribution of the soil among the Conquerors, Cortés adopted the
vicious system of _repartimientos_, universally practised among his
countrymen. In a letter to the emperor, he states that the superior
capacity of the Indians in New Spain had made him regard it as a
grievous thing to condemn them to servitude, as had been done in the
Islands. But, on further trial, he had found the Spaniards so much
harassed and impoverished that they could not hope to maintain
themselves in the land without enforcing the services of the natives,
and for this reason he had at length waived his own scruples in
compliance with their repeated remonstrances.[176] This was the wretched
pretext used on the like occasions by his countrymen to cover up this
flagrant act of injustice. The crown, however, in its instructions to
the general, disavowed the act and annulled the _repartimientos_.[177]
It was all in vain. The necessities, or rather the cupidity, of the
colonists, easily evaded the royal ordinances.{*} The colonial
legislation of Spain shows, in the repetition of enactments against
slavery, the perpetual struggle that subsisted between the crown and the
colonists, and the impotence of the former to enforce measures repugnant
to the interests, at all events to the avarice, of the latter. New Spain
furnishes no exception to the general fact.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account