History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire — Volume 2Gibbon, Edward
History
History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire — Volume 2
Gibbon, Edward
Byzantine Empire -- History -- To 527; Rome -- History -- Empire, 30 B.C.-476 A.D.
176 (return) [ Some precautions were taken (see Cod. Theod. l.
xi. tit. ii. and Cod. Justinian. l. x. tit. xxvii. leg. 1, 2, 3)
to restrain the magistrates from the abuse of their authority,
either in the exaction or in the purchase of corn: but those who
had learning enough to read the orations of Cicero against
Verres, (iii. de Frumento,) might instruct themselves in all the
various arts of oppression, with regard to the weight, the price,
the quality, and the carriage. The avarice of an unlettered
governor would supply the ignorance of precept or precedent.]
177 (return) [ Cod. Theod. l. xi. tit. xxviii. leg. 2, published
the 24th of March, A. D. 395, by the emperor Honorius, only two
months after the death of his father, Theodosius. He speaks of
528,042 Roman jugera, which I have reduced to the English
measure. The jugerum contained 28,800 square Roman feet.]
Either from design or from accident, the mode of assessment
seemed to unite the substance of a land tax with the forms of a
capitation. 178 The returns which were sent of every province or
district, expressed the number of tributary subjects, and the
amount of the public impositions. The latter of these sums was
divided by the former; and the estimate, that such a province
contained so many _capita_, or heads of tribute; and that each
_head_ was rated at such a price, was universally received, not
only in the popular, but even in the legal computation. The value
of a tributary head must have varied, according to many
accidental, or at least fluctuating circumstances; but some
knowledge has been preserved of a very curious fact, the more
important, since it relates to one of the richest provinces of
the Roman empire, and which now flourishes as the most splendid
of the European kingdoms. The rapacious ministers of Constantius
had exhausted the wealth of Gaul, by exacting twenty-five pieces
of gold for the annual tribute of every head. The humane policy
of his successor reduced the capitation to seven pieces. 179 A
moderate proportion between these opposite extremes of
extraordinary oppression and of transient indulgence, may
therefore be fixed at sixteen pieces of gold, or about nine
pounds sterling, the common standard, perhaps, of the impositions
of Gaul. 180 But this calculation, or rather, indeed, the facts
from whence it is deduced, cannot fail of suggesting two
difficulties to a thinking mind, who will be at once surprised by
the _equality_, and by the _enormity_, of the capitation. An
attempt to explain them may perhaps reflect some light on the
interesting subject of the finances of the declining empire.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account