History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire — Volume 3Gibbon, Edward
History
History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire — Volume 3
Gibbon, Edward
Byzantine Empire -- History -- To 527; Rome -- History -- Empire, 30 B.C.-476 A.D.
the East, betrayed, without scruple, the interest of his
benefactor; and the same troops, who had so lately massacred the
enemy of Stilicho, were engaged to support, against him, the
independence of the throne of Constantinople. The favorites of
Arcadius fomented a secret and irreconcilable war against a
formidable hero, who aspired to govern, and to defend, the two
empires of Rome, and the two sons of Theodosius. They incessantly
labored, by dark and treacherous machinations, to deprive him of
the esteem of the prince, the respect of the people, and the
friendship of the Barbarians. The life of Stilicho was repeatedly
attempted by the dagger of hired assassins; and a decree was
obtained from the senate of Constantinople, to declare him an
enemy of the republic, and to confiscate his ample possessions in
the provinces of the East. At a time when the only hope of
delaying the ruin of the Roman name depended on the firm union,
and reciprocal aid, of all the nations to whom it had been
gradually communicated, the subjects of Arcadius and Honorius
were instructed, by their respective masters, to view each other
in a foreign, and even hostile, light; to rejoice in their mutual
calamities, and to embrace, as their faithful allies, the
Barbarians, whom they excited to invade the territories of their
countrymen. 35 The natives of Italy affected to despise the
servile and effeminate Greeks of Byzantium, who presumed to
imitate the dress, and to usurp the dignity, of Roman senators;
36 and the Greeks had not yet forgot the sentiments of hatred and
contempt, which their polished ancestors had so long entertained
for the rude inhabitants of the West. The distinction of two
governments, which soon produced the separation of two nations,
will justify my design of suspending the series of the Byzantine
history, to prosecute, without interruption, the disgraceful, but
memorable, reign of Honorius.
33 (return) [ See the beautiful exordium of his invective against
Rufinus, which is curiously discussed by the sceptic Bayle,
Dictionnaire Critique, Rufin. Not. E.]
34 (return) [ See the Theodosian Code, l. ix. tit. xlii. leg. 14,
15. The new ministers attempted, with inconsistent avarice, to
seize the spoils of their predecessor, and to provide for their
own future security.]
35 (return) [ See Claudian, (i. Cons. Stilich, l. i. 275, 292,
296, l. ii. 83,) and Zosimus, (l. v. p. 302.)]
36 (return) [ Claudian turns the consulship of the eunuch
Eutropius into a national reflection, (l. ii. 134):—
—-Plaudentem cerne senatum, Et Byzantinos proceres Graiosque
Quirites: O patribus plebes, O digni consule patres.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account