History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire — Volume 4Gibbon, Edward
History
History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire — Volume 4
Gibbon, Edward
Byzantine Empire -- History -- To 527; Rome -- History -- Empire, 30 B.C.-476 A.D.
robust, who pursued their game without the apprehension of an
enemy. On the opposite bank the ambassadors descried a thousand
Armenian horse, who appeared to guard the passage of the
Euphrates. The tent of Belisarius was of the coarsest linen, the
simple equipage of a warrior who disdained the luxury of the
East. Around his tent, the nations who marched under his standard
were arranged with skilful confusion. The Thracians and Illyrians
were posted in the front, the Heruli and Goths in the centre; the
prospect was closed by the Moors and Vandals, and their loose
array seemed to multiply their numbers. Their dress was light and
active; one soldier carried a whip, another a sword, a third a
bow, a fourth, perhaps, a battle axe, and the whole picture
exhibited the intrepidity of the troops and the vigilance of the
general. Chosroes was deluded by the address, and awed by the
genius, of the lieutenant of Justinian. Conscious of the merit,
and ignorant of the force, of his antagonist, he dreaded a
decisive battle in a distant country, from whence not a Persian
might return to relate the melancholy tale. The great king
hastened to repass the Euphrates; and Belisarius pressed his
retreat, by affecting to oppose a measure so salutary to the
empire, and which could scarcely have been prevented by an army
of a hundred thousand men. Envy might suggest to ignorance and
pride, that the public enemy had been suffered to escape: but the
African and Gothic triumphs are less glorious than this safe and
bloodless victory, in which neither fortune, nor the valor of the
soldiers, can subtract any part of the general’s renown. The
second removal of Belisarius from the Persian to the Italian war
revealed the extent of his personal merit, which had corrected or
supplied the want of discipline and courage. Fifteen generals,
without concert or skill, led through the mountains of Armenia an
army of thirty thousand Romans, inattentive to their signals,
their ranks, and their ensigns. Four thousand Persians,
intrenched in the camp of Dubis, vanquished, almost without a
combat, this disorderly multitude; their useless arms were
scattered along the road, and their horses sunk under the fatigue
of their rapid flight. But the Arabs of the Roman party prevailed
over their brethren; the Armenians returned to their allegiance;
the cities of Dara and Edessa resisted a sudden assault and a
regular siege, and the calamities of war were suspended by those
of pestilence. A tacit or formal agreement between the two
sovereigns protected the tranquillity of the Eastern frontier;
and the arms of Chosroes were confined to the Colchian or Lazic
war, which has been too minutely described by the historians of
the times. 64
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account