History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire — Volume 5Gibbon, Edward
History
History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire — Volume 5
Gibbon, Edward
Byzantine Empire -- History -- To 527; Rome -- History -- Empire, 30 B.C.-476 A.D.
[A. D. 698-709.] The Greeks were expelled, but the Arabians were
not yet masters of the country. In the interior provinces the
Moors or Berbers,162 so feeble under the first Cesars, so
formidable to the Byzantine princes, maintained a disorderly
resistance to the religion and power of the successors of
Mahomet. Under the standard of their queen Cahina, the
independent tribes acquired some degree of union and discipline;
and as the Moors respected in their females the character of a
prophetess, they attacked the invaders with an enthusiasm similar
to their own. The veteran bands of Hassan were inadequate to the
defence of Africa: the conquests of an age were lost in a single
day; and the Arabian chief, overwhelmed by the torrent, retired
to the confines of Egypt, and expected, five years, the promised
succours of the caliph. After the retreat of the Saracens, the
victorious prophetess assembled the Moorish chiefs, and
recommended a measure of strange and savage policy. “Our cities,”
said she, “and the gold and silver which they contain,
perpetually attract the arms of the Arabs. These vile metals are
not the objects of OUR ambition; we content ourselves with the
simple productions of the earth. Let us destroy these cities; let
us bury in their ruins those pernicious treasures; and when the
avarice of our foes shall be destitute of temptation, perhaps
they will cease to disturb the tranquillity of a warlike people.”
The proposal was accepted with unanimous applause. From Tangier
to Tripoli the buildings, or at least the fortifications, were
demolished, the fruit-trees were cut down, the means of
subsistence were extirpated, a fertile and populous garden was
changed into a desert, and the historians of a more recent period
could discern the frequent traces of the prosperity and
devastation of their ancestors.
159 (return) [ This commander is styled by Nicephorus, ———— a
vague though not improper definition of the caliph. Theophanes
introduces the strange appellation of —————, which his
interpreter Goar explains by Vizir Azem. They may approach the
truth, in assigning the active part to the minister, rather than
the prince; but they forget that the Ommiades had only a kaleb,
or secretary, and that the office of Vizir was not revived or
instituted till the 132d year of the Hegira (d’Herbelot, 912).]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account