History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire — Volume 5Gibbon, Edward
History
History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire — Volume 5
Gibbon, Edward
Byzantine Empire -- History -- To 527; Rome -- History -- Empire, 30 B.C.-476 A.D.
167 (return) [ The fall and resurrection of the Gothic monarchy
are related by Mariana (tom. l. p. 238-260, l. vi. c. 19-26, l.
vii. c. 1, 2). That historian has infused into his noble work
(Historic de Rebus Hispaniae, libri xxx. Hagae Comitum 1733, in
four volumes, folio, with the continuation of Miniana), the style
and spirit of a Roman classic; and after the twelfth century, his
knowledge and judgment may be safely trusted. But the Jesuit is
not exempt from the prejudices of his order; he adopts and
adorns, like his rival Buchanan, the most absurd of the national
legends; he is too careless of criticism and chronology, and
supplies, from a lively fancy, the chasms of historical evidence.
These chasms are large and frequent; Roderic archbishop of
Toledo, the father of the Spanish history, lived five hundred
years after the conquest of the Arabs; and the more early
accounts are comprised in some meagre lines of the blind
chronicles of Isidore of Badajoz (Pacensis,) and of Alphonso III.
king of Leon, which I have seen only in the Annals of Pagi.]
If we inquire into the cause of this treachery, the Spaniards
will repeat the popular story of his daughter Cava;168 of a
virgin who was seduced, or ravished, by her sovereign; of a
father who sacrificed his religion and country to the thirst of
revenge. The passions of princes have often been licentious and
destructive; but this well-known tale, romantic in itself, is
indifferently supported by external evidence; and the history of
Spain will suggest some motives of interest and policy more
congenial to the breast of a veteran statesman.169 After the
decease or deposition of Witiza, his two sons were supplanted by
the ambition of Roderic, a noble Goth, whose father, the duke or
governor of a province, had fallen a victim to the preceding
tyranny. The monarchy was still elective; but the sons of Witiza,
educated on the steps of the throne, were impatient of a private
station. Their resentment was the more dangerous, as it was
varnished with the dissimulation of courts: their followers were
excited by the remembrance of favours and the promise of a
revolution: and their uncle Oppas, archbishop of Toledo and
Seville, was the first person in the church, and the second in
the state. It is probable that Julian was involved in the
disgrace of the unsuccessful faction, that he had little to hope
and much to fear from the new reign; and that the imprudent king
could not forget or forgive the injuries which Roderic and his
family had sustained. The merit and influence of the count
rendered him a useful or formidable subject: his estates were
ample, his followers bold and numerous, and it was too fatally
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account