History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire — Volume 6Gibbon, Edward
History
History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire — Volume 6
Gibbon, Edward
Byzantine Empire -- History -- To 527; Rome -- History -- Empire, 30 B.C.-476 A.D.
commanded the important place of Durazzo, assumed the title of
despot, and founded a strong and conspicuous principality in
Epirus, Ætolia, and Thessaly, which have ever been peopled by a
warlike race. The Greeks, who had offered their service to their
new sovereigns, were excluded by the haughty Latins 22 from all
civil and military honors, as a nation born to tremble and obey.
Their resentment prompted them to show that they might have been
useful friends, since they could be dangerous enemies: their
nerves were braced by adversity: whatever was learned or holy,
whatever was noble or valiant, rolled away into the independent
states of Trebizond, Epirus, and Nice; and a single patrician is
marked by the ambiguous praise of attachment and loyalty to the
Franks. The vulgar herd of the cities and the country would have
gladly submitted to a mild and regular servitude; and the
transient disorders of war would have been obliterated by some
years of industry and peace. But peace was banished, and industry
was crushed, in the disorders of the feudal system. The _Roman_
emperors of Constantinople, if they were endowed with abilities,
were armed with power for the protection of their subjects: their
laws were wise, and their administration was simple. The Latin
throne was filled by a titular prince, the chief, and often the
servant, of his licentious confederates; the fiefs of the empire,
from a kingdom to a castle, were held and ruled by the sword of
the barons; and their discord, poverty, and ignorance, extended
the ramifications of tyranny to the most sequestered villages.
The Greeks were oppressed by the double weight of the priests,
who were invested with temporal power, and of the soldier, who
was inflamed by fanatic hatred; and the insuperable bar of
religion and language forever separated the stranger and the
native. As long as the crusaders were united at Constantinople,
the memory of their conquest, and the terror of their arms,
imposed silence on the captive land: their dispersion betrayed
the smallness of their numbers and the defects of their
discipline; and some failures and mischances revealed the secret,
that they were not invincible. As the fears of the Greeks abated,
their hatred increased. They murdered; they conspired; and before
a year of slavery had elapsed, they implored, or accepted, the
succor of a Barbarian, whose power they had felt, and whose
gratitude they trusted. 23
17 (return) [ See the fate of Mourzoufle in Nicetas, (p. 393,)
Villehardouin, (No. 141—145, 163,) and Guntherus, (c. 20, 21.)
Neither the marshal nor the monk afford a grain of pity for a
tyrant or rebel, whose punishment, however, was more unexampled
than his crime.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account