History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire — Volume 6Gibbon, Edward
History
History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire — Volume 6
Gibbon, Edward
Byzantine Empire -- History -- To 527; Rome -- History -- Empire, 30 B.C.-476 A.D.
thrice divorced from my bed: but if thou hast not courage to meet
me in the field, mayest thou again receive _thy_ wives after they
have thrice endured the embraces of a stranger.” 30 Any violation
by word or deed of the secrecy of the harem is an unpardonable
offence among the Turkish nations; 31 and the political quarrel
of the two monarchs was imbittered by private and personal
resentment. Yet in his first expedition, Timour was satisfied
with the siege and destruction of Siwas or Sebaste, a strong city
on the borders of Anatolia; and he revenged the indiscretion of
the Ottoman, on a garrison of four thousand Armenians, who were
buried alive for the brave and faithful discharge of their duty.
311 As a Mussulman, he seemed to respect the pious occupation of
Bajazet, who was still engaged in the blockade of Constantinople;
and after this salutary lesson, the Mogul conqueror checked his
pursuit, and turned aside to the invasion of Syria and Egypt. In
these transactions, the Ottoman prince, by the Orientals, and
even by Timour, is styled the _Kaissar of Roum_, the Cæsar of the
Romans; a title which, by a small anticipation, might be given to
a monarch who possessed the provinces, and threatened the city,
of the successors of Constantine. 32
27 (return) [ See the Institutions, p. 141, to the end of the 1st
book, and Sherefeddin, (l. v. c. 1—16,) to the entrance of Timour
into Syria.]
28 (return) [ We have three copies of these hostile epistles in
the Institutions, (p. 147,) in Sherefeddin, (l. v. c. 14,) and in
Arabshah, (tom. ii. c. 19 p. 183—201;) which agree with each
other in the spirit and substance rather than in the style. It is
probable, that they have been translated, with various latitude,
from the Turkish original into the Arabic and Persian tongues. *
Note: Von Hammer considers the letter which Gibbon inserted in
the text to be spurious. On the various copies of these letters,
see his note, p 116.—M.]
29 (return) [ The Mogul emir distinguishes himself and his
countrymen by the name of _Turks_, and stigmatizes the race and
nation of Bajazet with the less honorable epithet of _Turkmans_.
Yet I do not understand how the Ottomans could be descended from
a Turkman sailor; those inland shepherds were so remote from the
sea, and all maritime affairs. * Note: Price translated the word
pilot or boatman.—M.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account