Mr. Morrill, of Maine, Mr. Yates, Mr. Harlan, and Mr. Stewart, would vote to convict on the Articles relating to the removal of Mr. Stanton--uncommitted on all others. Mr. Fessenden, Mr. Fowler, Mr. Grimes, Mr. Henderson, Mr. Trumbull, and Mr. Van Winkle, each declared, at that conference, their opposition to the entire list of the Articles of Impeachment. But eighteen Republicans committed themselves at that conference, for conviction, out of twenty-four who filed opinions. While it was taken for granted that the six Democrats who had failed to declare their position at that conference would oppose conviction, the position of the eighteen Republicans who had failed to declare themselves became at once a source of very grave concern in impeachment circles. Out of that list of eighteen uncommitted Republicans, but one vote was necessary to defeat the impeachment. This condition was still farther intensified by the fact that eight of the eleven Articles of Impeachment were already beaten in that conference, and practically by Republican committals, and among them the head and front and foundation of the indictment--the First Article--by Messrs. Sherman and Howe, two conspicuous Republican leaders. A forecast of the vote based on these committals as to the several Articles, would be against the First Article, twelve Democrats and eight Republicans, one more than necessary for its defeat--the eight "not guilty" votes including Messrs. Sherman and Howe. Against the Fourth Article--twelve Democrats and nine Republicans--including Messrs. Edmunds, Ferry, and Morrill of Vermont. Against the Fifth Article--twelve Democrats and eight Republicans-including Messrs. Edmunds and Ferry. Against the Sixth Article--twelve Democrats and nine Republicans-including Messrs. Ferry, Howe, and Morrill of Vermont. Against the Seventh--Article-twelve Democrats and seven Republicans--including Mr. Ferry. Against the Eighth Article--twelve Democrats and seven Republicans--including Mr. Edmunds. Against the Ninth Article--twelve Democrats and twelve Republicans--including Messrs. Sherman, Edmunds, Ferry, Howe, Howard, and Morrill of Vermont. Against the Tenth Article--twelve Democrats and ten Republicans--including Messrs. Edmunds, Sherman, Ferry, and Morrill of Vermont. It is somewhat conspicuous that but three gentlemen--Messrs. Sumner, Pomeroy, and Tipton, in their arguments in the Conference, pronounced the President guilty on all the charges--though five others, Messrs. Wilson, Patterson of New Hampshire, Frelinghuysen, Cattell, and Williams, pronounced the President guilty on general principles, without specification; and Messrs. Morrill of Maine, Yates and Stewart, guilty in the removal of Mr. Stanton, without further specification of charges.