History of the inductive sciences, from the earliest to the present timeWhewell, William
History
History of the inductive sciences, from the earliest to the present time
Whewell, William
Science -- History
We may, I conceive, look upon the formation of the constellations,
and the notions thus connected with them, as a very early attempt to
find a meaning in the relations of the stars; and as an utter
failure. The first effort to associate the appearances and motions
of the skies by conceptions implying unity and connection, was made
in a wrong direction, as may very easily be supposed. Instead of
considering the appearances only with reference to space, time,
number, in a manner purely rational, a number of other elements,
imagination, tradition, hope, fear, awe of the supernatural, belief
in destiny, were called into action. Man, still young, as a
philosopher at least, had yet to learn what notions his successful
guesses on these subjects must involve, and what they must exclude.
At that period, nothing could be more natural or excusable than this
ignorance; but it is curious to see how long and how obstinately the
belief lingered (if indeed it be yet extinct) that the motions of
the stars, and the dispositions and fortunes of men, may come under
some common conceptions and laws, by which a connection between the
one and the other may be established.
We cannot, therefore, agree with those who consider Astrology in the
early ages as "only a degraded Astronomy, the abuse of a more
ancient science."[33\3] It was the first step to astronomy by
leading to habits and means of grouping phenomena; and, after a
while, by showing that pictorial and mythological relations among
the stars had no very obvious value. From that time, the inductive
process went on steadily in the true road, under the guidance of
ideas of space, time, and number.
[Note 33\3: Ib. vi. 546.]
_Sect._ 7.--_The Planets._
WHILE men were becoming familiar with the fixed stars, the planets
must have attracted their notice. Venus, from her brightness, and
{127} from her accompanying the sun at no great distance, and thus
appearing as the morning and evening star, was very conspicuous.
Pythagoras is said to have maintained that the evening and morning
star are the same body, which certainly must have been one of the
earliest discoveries on this subject; and indeed we can hardly
conceive men noticing the stars for a year or two without coming to
this conclusion.
Jupiter and Mars, sometimes still brighter than Venus, were also
very noticeable. Saturn and Mercury were less so, but in fine
climates they and their motion would soon be detected by persons
observant of the heavens. To reduce to any rule the movements of
these luminaries must have taken time and thought; probably before
this was done, certainly very early, these heavenly bodies were
brought more peculiarly under those views which we have noticed as
leading to astrology.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account