History of the inductive sciences, from the earliest to the present timeWhewell, William
History
History of the inductive sciences, from the earliest to the present time
Whewell, William
Science -- History
1. _Fixity of the Stars._--The question necessarily arose after the
discovery of the precession, even if such a question had never
suggested itself before, whether the stars which were called
_fixed_, and to which the motions of the other luminaries are
referred, do really retain constantly the same relative position. In
order to determine this fundamental question, Hipparchus undertook
to construct a _Map_ of the heavens; for though the result of his
survey was expressed in words, we may give this name to his
Catalogue of the positions of the most conspicuous stars. These
positions are described by means of _alineations_; that is, three or
more such stars are selected as can be touched by an apparent
straight line drawn in the heavens. Thus Hipparchus observed that
the southern claw of Cancer, the bright star in the same
constellation which precedes the head of the Hydra, and the bright
star Procyon, were nearly in the same line. Ptolemy quotes this and
many other of the configurations which Hipparchus had noted, in
order to show that the positions of the stars had not changed in the
intermediate time; a truth which the catalogue of Hipparchus thus
gave astronomers the means of ascertaining. It contained 1080 stars.
The construction of this catalogue of the stars by Hipparchus is an
event of great celebrity in the history of astronomy. Pliny,[77\3]
who speaks of it with admiration as a wonderful and superhuman task
("ausus rem etiam Deo improbam, annumerare posteris stellas"),
asserts the undertaking to have been suggested by a remarkable
astronomical event, the appearance of a new star; "novam stellam et
alium in ævo suo genitam deprehendit; ejusque motu, qua die fulsit,
ad dubitationem est adductus anne hoc sæpius fieret, moverenturque
et eæ quas putamus affixas." There is nothing inherently improbable
in this tradition, but we may observe, with Delambre,[78\3] that we
are not informed whether this new star remained in the sky, or soon
disappeared again. Ptolemy makes no mention of the star or the
story; and his catalogue contains no _bright_ star which is not
found in the "Catasterisms" of Eratosthenes. These Catasterisms were
an enumeration of 475 of the principal stars, according to the
constellations in which they are, and were published about sixty
years before Hipparchus.
[Note 77\3: _Nat. Hist._ lib. ii. (xxvi.)]
[Note 78\3: _A. A._ i. 290.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account