History of the inductive sciences, from the earliest to the present timeWhewell, William
History
History of the inductive sciences, from the earliest to the present time
Whewell, William
Science -- History
In the sixth century, indeed, in the reign of Justinian, we find a
writer (Cosmas Indicopleustes[11\4]) who does not rest in this
obscurity of {197} representation; but in this case, the
distinctness of the pictures only serves to show his want of any
clear conception as to what suppositions would explain the
phenomena. He describes the earth as an oblong floor, surrounded by
upright walls, and covered by a vault, below which the heavenly
bodies perform their revolutions, going round a certain high
mountain, which occupies the northern parts of the earth, and makes
night by intercepting the light of the sun. In Augustin[12\4] (who
flourished A. D. 400) the opinion is treated on other grounds; and
without denying the globular form of the earth, it is asserted that
there are no inhabitants on the opposite side, because no such race
is recorded by Scripture among the descendants of Adam.[13\4]
Considerations of the same kind operated in the well-known instance
of Virgil, Bishop of Salzburg, in the eighth century. When he was
reported to Boniface, Archbishop of Mentz, as holding the existence
of Antipodes, the prelate was shocked at the assumption, as it
seemed to him, of a world of human beings, out of the reach of the
conditions of salvation; and application was made to Pope Zachary
for a censure of the holder of this dangerous doctrine. It does not,
however, appear that this led to any severity; and the story of the
deposition of Virgil from his bishopric, which is circulated by
Kepler and by more modern writers, is undoubtedly altogether false.
The same scruples continued to prevail among Christian writers to a
later period; and Tostatus[14\4] notes the opinion of the rotundity
of the earth as an "unsafe" doctrine, only a few years before
Columbus visited the other hemisphere.
[Note 11\4: Montfaucon, _Collectio Nova Patrum_, t. ii. p. 113.
Cosmas Indicopleustes. Christianorum Opiniones de Mundo, sive
Topographia Christiana.]
[Note 12\4: _Civ. D._ xvi. 9.]
[Note 13\4: It appears, however, that scriptural arguments were
found on the other side. St. Jerome says (_Comm. in Ezech._ i. 6),
speaking of the two cherubims with four faces, seen by the prophet,
and the interpretation of the vision: "Alii vero qui philosophorum
stultam sequuntur sapientiam, duo hemispheria in duobus templi
cherubim, nos et antipodes, quasi supinos et cadentes homines
suspicantur."]
[Note 14\4: Montfauc. _Patr._ t. ii.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account