History of the inductive sciences, from the earliest to the present timeWhewell, William
History
History of the inductive sciences, from the earliest to the present time
Whewell, William
Science -- History
IN speaking of the character of the age of commentators, we noticed
principally the ingenious servility which it displays;--the
acuteness with which it finds ground for speculation in the
expression of other men's thoughts;--the want of all vigor and
fertility in acquiring any real and new truths. Such was the
character of the reasoners of the stationary period from the first;
but, at a later day, this character, from various causes, was
modified by new features. The servility which had yielded itself to
the yoke, insisted upon forcing it on the necks of others: the
subtlety which found all the truth it needed in certain accredited
writings, resolved that no one should find there, or in any other
region, any other truths; speculative men became tyrants without
ceasing to be slaves; to their character of Commentators they added
that of Dogmatists.
1. _Origin of the Scholastic Philosophy._--The causes of this change
have been very happily analyzed and described by several modern
writers.[62\4] The general nature of the process may be briefly
stated to have been the following.
[Note 62\4: Dr. Hampden, in the Life of Thomas Aquinas, in the
_Encyc. Metrop._ Degerando, _Hist. Comparée_, vol. iv. Also
Tennemann, _Hist. of Phil._ vol. viii. Introduction.]
The tendencies of the later times of the Roman empire to a
commenting literature, and a second-hand philosophy, have already
been noticed. The loss of the dignity of political freedom, the want
of the cheerfulness of advancing prosperity, and the substitution of
the less philosophical structure of the Latin language for the
delicate intellectual mechanism of the Greek, fixed and augmented
the prevalent feebleness and barrenness of intellect. Men forgot, or
feared, to consult nature, to seek for new truths, to do what the
great discoverers of other times had done; they were content to
consult libraries, to study and defend old opinions, to talk of what
great geniuses had said. They sought their philosophy in accredited
treatises, and dared not question such doctrines as they there found.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account