History of the inductive sciences, from the earliest to the present timeWhewell, William
History
History of the inductive sciences, from the earliest to the present time
Whewell, William
Science -- History
We may consider the reign of mere disputation as fully established
at the time of which we are now speaking; and the only kind of
philosophy henceforth studied was one in which no sound physical
science had or could have a place. The wavering abstractions,
indistinct generalizations, and loose classifications of common
language, which we have already noted as the fountain of the physics
of the Greek Schools of philosophy, were also the only source from
which the Schoolmen of the middle ages drew their views, or rather
their arguments: and though these notional and verbal relations were
invested with a most complex and pedantic technicality, they did
not, on that account, become at all more precise as notions, or more
likely to lead to a single real truth. Instead of acquiring distinct
ideas, they multiplied abstract terms; instead of real
generalizations, they had recourse to verbal distinctions. The whole
course of their employments tended to make them, not only ignorant
of physical truth, but incapable of conceiving its nature.
Having thus taken upon themselves the task of raising and discussing
questions by means of abstract terms, verbal distinctions, and
logical rules alone, there was no tendency in their activity to come
to an end, as there was no progress. The same questions, the same
answers, the same difficulties, the same solutions, the same verbal
subtleties,--sought for, admired, cavilled at, abandoned,
reproduced, and again admired,--might recur without limit. John of
Salisbury[79\4] observes of the Parisian teachers, that, after
several years' absence, he found them not a step advanced, and still
employed in urging and parrying the same arguments; and this, as Mr.
Hallam remarks,[80\4] "was equally applicable to the period of
centuries." The same knots were tied and {235} untied; the same
clouds were formed and dissipated. The poet's censure of "the Sons
of Aristotle," is just as happily expressed:
They stand
Locked up together hand in hand
Every one leads as he is led,
The same bare path they tread,
And dance like Fairies a fantastic round,
But neither change their motion nor their ground.
[Note 79\4: He studied logic at Paris, at St. Geneviève, and then
left them. "Duodecennium mihi elapsum est diversis studiis
occupatum. Jucundum itaque visum est veteres quos reliqueram, et
quos adhuc Dialectica detinebat in monte, (Sanctæ Genovefæ) revisere
socios, conferre cum eis super ambiguitatibus pristinis; ut nostrûm
invicem collatione mutuâ commetiremur profectum. Inventi sunt, qui
fuerant, et ubi; neque enim ad palmam visi sunt processisse ad
quæstiones pristinis dirimendas, neque propositiunculam unam
adjecerant. Quibus urgebant stimulis eisdem et ipsi urgebantur," &c.
_Metalogicus_, lib. ii. cap. 10.]
[Note 80\4: _Middle Ages_, iii. 537.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account