History of the inductive sciences, from the earliest to the present timeWhewell, William
History
History of the inductive sciences, from the earliest to the present time
Whewell, William
Science -- History
[Note 14\5: This passage has so important a place in the history, that
I will give it in the original:--"Intellexeram te non modo veterum
mathematicorum inventa egregie callere sed etiam novam mundi rationem
constituisse: Qua doceas terram moveri: solem imum mundi, atque medium
locum obtinere: cœlum octavum immotum atque fixum perpetuo manere:
Lunam se una cum inclusis suæ spheræ elementis, inter Martis et
Veneris cœlum sitam, anniversario cursu circum solem convertere. Atque
de hac tota astronomiæ ratione commentarios a te confectos esse, ac
erraticarum stellarum motus calculis subductos tabulis te contulisse,
maxima omnium cum admiratione. Quamobrem vir doctissime, nisi tibi
molestus sum, te etiam atque etiam oro vehementer ut hoc tuum inventum
studiosis communices, et tuas de mundi sphæra lucubrationes, una cum
Tabulis et si quid habes præterea quod ad eandem rem pertineat primo
quoque tempore ad me mittas."]
This letter is dated 1536, and implies that the work of Copernicus
was then written, and known to persons who studied astronomy.
Delambre says that Achilles Gassarus of Lindau, in a letter dated
1540, sends to his friend George Vogelin of Constance, the book _De
Revolutionibus_. But Mr. De Morgan[15\5] has pointed out that the
printed work which Gassarus sent to Vogelin was the _Narratio_ by
Rheticus of Feldkirch, a eulogium of Copernicus and his system
prefixed to the second edition of the _De Revolutionibus_, which
appeared in 1566. In this Narration, Rheticus speaks of the work of
Copernicus as a Palingenesia, or New Birth of astronomy. Rheticus,
it appears, had gone to Copernicus for the purpose of getting
knowledge about triangles and trigonometrical tables, and had had
his attention called to the heliocentric theory, of which he became
an ardent admirer. He speaks of his "Preceptor" with strong
admiration, as we have seen. "He appears to me," says he, "more to
resemble Ptolemy than any other astronomers." This, it must be
recollected, was selecting the highest known subject of comparison.
[Note 15\5: _Ast. Mod._ i. p. 138. I owe this and many other
corrections to the personal kindness of Mr. De Morgan.]
CHAPTER III.
SEQUEL TO COPERNICUS.--THE RECEPTION AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE
COPERNICAN THEORY.
_Sect._ 1.--_First Reception of the Copernican Theory._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account