History of the inductive sciences, from the earliest to the present timeWhewell, William
History
History of the inductive sciences, from the earliest to the present time
Whewell, William
Science -- History
This proposition is proved by Archimedes in a work which is still
extant, and the proof holds its place in our treatises to this day,
as the simplest which can be given. The demonstration is made to
rest on assumptions which amount in effect to such Definitions and
Axioms as these: That those bodies are of equal weight which balance
each other at equal arms of a straight lever; and that in every
heavy body there is a definite point called a _Centre of Gravity_,
in which point we may suppose the weight of the body collected.
The principle, which is really the foundation of the validity of the
demonstration thus given, and which is the condition of all
experimental knowledge on the subject, is this: that when two equal
weights are supported on a lever, they act on the fulcrum of the lever
with the {97} same effect as if they were both together supported
immediately at that point. Or more generally, we may state the
principle to be this: that the pressure by which a heavy body is
supported continues the same, however we alter the form or position of
the body, so long as the magnitude and material continue the same.
The experimental truth of this principle is a matter of obvious and
universal experience. The weight of a basket of stones is not
altered by shaking the stones into new positions. We cannot make the
direct burden of a stone less by altering its position in our hands;
and if we try the effect on a balance or a machine of any kind, we
shall see still more clearly and exactly that the altered position
of one weight, or the altered arrangement of several, produces no
change in their effect, so long as their point of support remains
unchanged.
This general fact is obvious, when we possess in our minds the ideas
which are requisite to apprehend it clearly. But when we are so
prepared, the truth appears to be manifest, even independent of
experience, and is seen to be a rule to which experience must
conform. What, then, is the leading idea which thus enables us to
reason effectively upon mechanical subjects? By attention to the
course of such reasonings, we perceive that it is the idea of
_Pressure_; Pressure being conceived as a measurable effect of heavy
bodies at rest, distinguishable from all other effects, such as
motion, change of figure, and the like. It is not here necessary to
attempt to trace the history of this idea in our minds; but it is
certain that such an idea may be distinctly formed, and that upon it
the whole science of statics may be built. _Pressure_, _load_,
_weight_, are names by which this idea is denoted when the effect
tends directly downwards; but we may have pressure without motion,
or _dead pull_, in other cases, as at the critical instant when two
nicely-matched wrestlers are balanced by the exertion of the utmost
strength of each.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account