History of the inductive sciences, from the earliest to the present timeWhewell, William
History
History of the inductive sciences, from the earliest to the present time
Whewell, William
Science -- History
THE year, considered as a recurring cycle of seasons and of general
appearances, must attract the notice of man as soon as his attention
and memory suffice to bind together the parts of a succession of the
length of several years. But to make the same term imply a certain
fixed number of days, we must know how many days the cycle of the
seasons occupies; a knowledge which requires faculties and artifices
beyond what we have already mentioned. For instance, men cannot
reckon as far as any number at all approaching the number of days in
the year, without possessing a system of numeral terms, and methods
{114} of practical numeration on which such a system of terms is
always founded.[2\3] The South American Indians, the Koussa Caffres
and Hottentots, and the natives of New Holland, all of whom are said
to be unable to reckon further than the fingers of their hands and
feet,[3\3] cannot, as we do, include in their notion of a year the
fact of its consisting of 365 days. This fact is not likely to be
known to any nation except those which have advanced far beyond that
which may be considered as the earliest scientific process which we
can trace in the history of the human race, the formation of a
method of designating the successive numbers to an indefinite
extent, by means of names, framed according to the decimal, quinary,
or vigenary scale.
[Note 2\3: _Arithmetic_ in _Encyc. Metrop._ (by Dr. Peacock), Art. 8.]
[Note 3\3: Ibid. Art. 32.]
But even if we suppose men to have the habit of recording the
passage of each day, and of counting the score thus recorded, it
would be by no means easy for them to determine the exact number of
days in which the cycle of the seasons recurs; for the
indefiniteness of the appearances which mark the same season of the
year, and the changes to which they are subject as the seasons are
early or late, would leave much uncertainty respecting the duration
of the year. They would not obtain any accuracy on this head, till
they had attended for a considerable time to the motions and places
of the sun; circumstances which require more precision of notice
than the general facts of the degrees of heat and light. The motions
of the sun, the succession of the places of his rising and setting
at different times of the year, the greatest heights which he
reaches, the proportion of the length of day and night, would all
exhibit several cycles. The turning back of the sun, when he had
reached the greatest distance to the south or to the north, as shown
either by his rising or by his height at noon, would perhaps be the
most observable of such circumstances. Accordingly the τροπαὶ
ἠελίοιο, the turnings of the sun, are used repeatedly by Hesiod as a
mark from which he reckons the seasons of various employments.
"Fifty days," he says, "after the turning of the sun, is a
seasonable time for beginning a voyage."[4\3]
[Note 4\3: Ἤματα πεντήκοντα μετὰ τροπὰς ἠελίοιο
Ἐς τέλος ἐλθόντος θέρεος.--_Op. et Dies_, 661.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account