History of the Jesuits: Their origin, progress, doctrines, and designsNicolini, G. B. (Giovanni Battista)
History
History of the Jesuits: Their origin, progress, doctrines, and designs
Nicolini, G. B. (Giovanni Battista)
Jesuits -- History
Remorse for the massacre of St Bartholomew had deprived Charles IX. of
his reason, and brought him to an early grave. His brother, Henry III.,
who succeeded him, either awed by the fate of Charles, or occupied
only with his pleasures, allowed those same Protestants whom, as Duke
of Anjou, he had defeated at Moncontour and other places, to live in
peace. Henry’s indolence favoured the ambitious views of the Duke of
Guise, who aspired at nothing less than the throne of France. He and his
partisans, particularly the Jesuits, stirred up the fanaticism of the
more bigoted of the citizens against the king, who, although a scrupulous
observer of all those external practices in which the Popish religion
chiefly consists, was considered by the Church party a bad Catholic. A
remedy was to be found, lest France should become a Protestant country.
An association was accordingly set on foot, which took the name of
the League, or “Holy Union.” The vulgar saw in it the bulwark of the
faith—Philip of Spain, indirectly the sovereignty of France—and Henry of
Guise, the throne. The members of this association took the following
oath:—“I swear to God, the Creator, and under penalty of anathema and
eternal damnation, that I have entered into this Catholic Association,
according to the form of the treaty which has just been read to me,
loyally and sincerely either to command, or to obey and serve; and I
promise with my life and my honour, to continue therein to the last drop
of my blood, without resisting it or withdrawing from it, at any command,
or any pretext, excuse, or occasion whatsoever.”[166] In 1577, Guise
was declared chief of the League; and in 1584, he, a subject, had the
audacity to enter publicly into a confederacy with Philip II. of Spain.
The Articles of Alliance purported, “that a confederacy, offensive and
defensive, was entered into betwixt the king and the Catholic princes in
behalf of themselves and their descendants, for the maintenance of the
Roman Catholic religion in France as well as the Low Countries: and, on
the death of Henry III., to take measures that Cardinal de Bourbon should
be appointed his successor; the heretic and relapsed princes being for
ever excluded from the right of succession.”[167]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account