History of the Jesuits: Their origin, progress, doctrines, and designsNicolini, G. B. (Giovanni Battista)
History
History of the Jesuits: Their origin, progress, doctrines, and designs
Nicolini, G. B. (Giovanni Battista)
Jesuits -- History
“An unbeliever who is persuaded that his sect is probable, although the
opposite sect may be more probable, would certainly be obliged, _at
the point of death_, to embrace the true faith, which he thinks to be
the more probable.... _But, except under such circumstances, he would
not.... Add to this, that the mysteries of faith are so sublime, and the
Christian morals so repugnant to the laws of flesh and blood, that no
greater probability whatever may be accounted sufficient to enforce the
obligation of believing._[235]
“Indeed, while I perceive so many different opinions maintained upon
points connected with morality, I think that the Divine providence is
apparent; _for, in diversity of opinions, the yoke of Christ is easily
borne_.”[236]
“A confessor may absolve penitents, according to the probable opinion of
the penitent, in opposition to his own, and is even bound to do so.”[237]
“Again, it is probable that pecuniary compensation may be made for
defamation; it is also probable that it cannot be made. May I, the
defamed, exact to-day pecuniary compensation from my defamer, and
to-morrow, and even on the same day, may I, the defamer of another,
refuse to compensate with money for the reputation of which I have
deprived him?... _I affirm that it is lawful to do at pleasure sometimes
the one and sometimes the other._
“_Those ignorant confessors are to be blamed who always think that they
do well in obliging their penitents to make restitution, because it is at
all times more safe._”[238]
By this abominable doctrine the confessors were made to answer yes or no,
as might be most agreeable to their penitents; and these might oblige the
confessor to absolve them of their sins, if they only themselves believed
that they were not sins. Imagine what an arrant knave the person inclined
to do evil must have become, when, to the firm belief that the absolution
of the confessor cleanses from all crimes, was superadded the certainty
that this confessor must absolve him almost according to his own wishes.
We shudder to think of it!
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account