History of the Jesuits: Their origin, progress, doctrines, and designsNicolini, G. B. (Giovanni Battista)
History
History of the Jesuits: Their origin, progress, doctrines, and designs
Nicolini, G. B. (Giovanni Battista)
Jesuits -- History
Romanism, a doctrine which, according to them, confers upon the Pope the
right of supremacy, of disposing of the crown at his pleasure, and of
releasing the subjects from their allegiance to a heretic sovereign, and
which, consequently, amounts to high treason. In this aspect alone can be
in part excused those sanguinary laws of persecution and tyranny enacted
in the reigns of Elizabeth and James against the Roman Catholics. We
insist upon this consideration.
Now, in the particular case which we are examining—the gunpowder plot—we
believe that Catesby and Percy, _at first_, contrived the plot without
the knowledge or participation of the Jesuits, as it is not denied
that afterwards Gerard, Tezmund _alias_ Greenwall, and Garnet, were
made acquainted with it in all its horrid details. The whole question
regarding Garnet, who alone suffered for the conspiracy, has hitherto
amounted to this—whether he knew of it in any other way than as it was
revealed to him by Father Gerard, under the seal of confession. And
the Jesuits and Papists insist upon this point, pretending that, in
such a case, Garnet could not reveal the conspiracy without committing
sacrilege. To speak the truth, we are inclined to believe that he,
literally speaking, did not know of it otherwise; and these are the
reasons why we believe so. Garnet was not, like Parson, a bold and daring
partisan, capable of braving any danger, of attempting any enterprise.
He was a very poor conspirator, in no way disposed to earn the palm of
martyrdom. Catesby, who had been his associate in the plots during the
reign of Elizabeth, must have known him well, so that he and the other
conspirators did not trust him at first even with their confession. It
was Greenway who, in our opinion, violated the seal of confession by
apprising his superior of what was going on. It is not improbable, then,
that when afterwards Catesby proposed to disclose to him the whole plan
of the plot, Garnet, who had nothing to learn, refused to listen to him,
in order that, in case of ill-success, he might not be accused of being
an accomplice. That all the Jesuits approved of the plot and wished it
success, there is very little doubt, and we even believe that, without
speaking openly to the point, Garnet must have indirectly, by cunning,
adroit insinuations, encouraged the conspirators to consummate the
horrible crime. It is a fact deponed by Bates, and indubitably proved,
that Garnet and the other two Jesuits had frequent interviews with
Catesby and the other conspirators some few days before that which had
been fixed upon for the execution of the plot; and we do not hesitate to
say, that had Garnet wished to deter the conspirators from their infernal
projects, he might have found a thousand ways of doing so without at all
betraying the secrets of the confessional. But suppose that, as we have
said, Garnet and Greenway did not know of the conspiracy except under
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account