History of the Jesuits: Their origin, progress, doctrines, and designsNicolini, G. B. (Giovanni Battista)
History
History of the Jesuits: Their origin, progress, doctrines, and designs
Nicolini, G. B. (Giovanni Battista)
Jesuits -- History
approaching a fall and destruction.” And the letter concludes with these
remarkable words—“I eagerly call all to witness and proclaim to them,
that with Bernard I expect an answer to this epistle, but an answer of
_deeds_, not words.”[307] “So that,” says Gioberti, “during Vitelleschi’s
government, the spirit of the Constitution was quite changed: the
politicians prevailed over the saints, and a worldly spirit over that of
mysticism.”[308]
The evil increased under Caraffa, who succeeded Vitelleschi in 1646,
and who was still less able than his predecessor to govern the Society.
Caraffa was a simple and innocent bigot, not altogether unworthy of
commendation. He was remarkable for his humility: he would have no
carriage, no servant, no mark of distinction, as to food or raiment, from
the humblest of the brethren.[309] He repeatedly begged his disciples to
lay aside all political and temporal concerns, and to live a religious
and pious life. He was shocked and grieved at heart on account of the
pervading spirit of licentiousness and avarice, and predicted that it
would be the ruin of the order. In fact, the Society was continually
departing more and more from the principles on which Loyola had
established it. The rule, that all who entered the order should abandon
every temporal possession, had been strictly enforced in former times,
but now the act of renunciation was either delayed, or performed under
conditions, and that under different pretences, and especially on the
ground that any Jesuit was liable at any time to be expelled from the
Society. So when a novice now made the transfer of his property to the
order, he clearly specified that it was in favour of such and such a
college to which he was attached, and often with the reservation of
himself administering the property he bequeathed; so that, even when
the property remained in the order, it was no more unconditionally at
the disposal of the General representing the entire community, but of
an individual, who, in a certain measure, still considered it as his
own. Nay, many of the Jesuits, having more leisure and skill than their
relations, undertook the management of their affairs.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account