History of the Jesuits: Their origin, progress, doctrines, and designsNicolini, G. B. (Giovanni Battista)
History
History of the Jesuits: Their origin, progress, doctrines, and designs
Nicolini, G. B. (Giovanni Battista)
Jesuits -- History
In 1681, Noyelle, “who had not the same brilliant qualities as his
predecessors,”[320] succeeded Oliva, and was himself succeeded, in
1687, by Gonzales, a harsh theologian, who died in 1705, and had for
his successor Father Tambourini. Nothing remarkable happened during the
rule of these generals; at least nothing that presents us with any new
feature in the history we are writing. The Company followed the course
it had entered upon, and marched with steady step towards its proper
ruin. Not that there was any apparent sign of decay. The Society was,
on the contrary, more powerful, more courted than ever. But its power
did not lie any longer in its intrinsic merits, or its adaptation to the
wants of humanity; and the interest and respect by which it seemed to
be surrounded was ephemeral, and in some degree compulsory. With a few
sincere devotees there was a crowd of courtiers who flattered for their
own interest. The Company resembled an all-powerful minister, hated for
his personal qualities, but worshipped and extolled to the skies by the
crowd of those who fear his power or await his favour, impatient till the
sovereign frown upon him, that they may manifest their real sentiments.
Such was the state of the Society of Jesus during the seventeenth
century.
CHAPTER XV.
1700-1772.
DOWNFALL OF THE JESUITS.
We have brought down our history to the beginning of the eighteenth
century, an epoch in which the power and greatness of the Society of
Jesus had, by a gradual march, ascended to a point from which, following
the law inherent in all human things, it could not but decline; for
institutions, empires, and nations, have, as well as man himself, their
successive periods of infancy, youth, manhood, old age, and decrepitude;
and if institutions, doctrines, or nations, revive after their moral
death, they never regain the same degree of force and vitality which
they possessed when rising to the maturity of their power. According to
this constant rule, it was evident to any profound observer that the
Jesuits had attained that height from which they must inevitably descend;
but, as always happens, they never dreamed of their impending fate, and
scorned the sinister forebodings of some of their number who foresaw and
predicted it. Then, when these predictions proved true, they laid the
blame of their fall upon every one but its real authors—themselves; for
it is to them that must be attributed the ruin of their institution. To
the causes of decay which we have stated, we must add that which was
perhaps the principal one—namely, that the Jesuits, once in possession of
power, remitted their prodigious activity, for which they had been so
remarkable at the commencement of their institution, and even disregarded
those arts by which they had obtained that power. Even the Instruction,
that all-powerful engine which had so admirably served their purposes,
was neglected, and had lost its original character. It was no longer
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account