History of the Jesuits: Their origin, progress, doctrines, and designsNicolini, G. B. (Giovanni Battista)
History
History of the Jesuits: Their origin, progress, doctrines, and designs
Nicolini, G. B. (Giovanni Battista)
Jesuits -- History
These are the motives assigned for this conduct by the opponents of the
Jesuits, and they rest, as may be seen, on very high authority. On the
other hand, the Jesuits and their friends assert that the whole affair
was an abominable and dishonourable plot of Choiseul. They pretend that
the duke had managed to put into the hands of Charles an autograph letter
supposed to be written by the General of the order to a provincial
in Spain, in which it was asserted that Charles was an illegitimate
son of Cardinal Alberoni, and that the throne belonged to Don Louis,
the king’s younger brother, and that it was this letter that excited
the resentment of Charles. Crétineau affirms that such was the case.
“Charles, who remained a fervent Christian, would not have destroyed
the institute, but that they affixed upon his royal escutcheon the
stigma of illegitimacy.... This fact is certified by other contemporary
testimonies, and by the documents of the Company.”[347] Ranke, without
accusing either party, seems to incline to this supposition, and says,
“Charles III. became persuaded that it was one of the purposes of the
Jesuits to raise his brother Don Louis to the throne in his place.”[348]
Now, rejecting the absurd accusation of the forgery of this letter, which
many reasons render altogether impossible, and which is by no means
consistent with the character of Choiseul, and adopting the version of
Ranke or of Ossun, there still remains to be explained the enmity of the
Jesuits against such a good Roman Catholic as Charles; and this enmity,
no historian, as far as we know, has ever attempted to explain. Yet this
is the point most necessary to be examined; because, unless we suppose
that such a sagacious and clear-sighted man as Charles III., after a
year of strict and severe investigation, came to the serious decision
of condemning the Jesuits solely on the authority of a forged letter,
without any other proof of their ill-will to him, it remains certain
that the Jesuits were guilty, and adverse to his person and government.
Whence, we repeat, this enmity? By considering a little the well-known
character of the Jesuits, we may perhaps be able to answer the query.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account