History of the Jesuits: Their origin, progress, doctrines, and designsNicolini, G. B. (Giovanni Battista)
History
History of the Jesuits: Their origin, progress, doctrines, and designs
Nicolini, G. B. (Giovanni Battista)
Jesuits -- History
The man who after Xavier had the greatest success in India, but who
also perverted the character of the mission, and introduced the most
abominable idolatry, was Father Francis Nobili. He arrived at Madura in
1606, and was surprised that Christianity had made so little progress
in so long a time, which he attributed to the strong aversion which the
Indian had for the European, and to the fact, that the Jesuits, having
addressed themselves more especially to the Pariahs, had caused Christ
to be considered as the Pariahs’ God.[89] He therefore resolved to play
the part of a Hindoo and a Brahmin. After having learned with wonderful
facility their rites, their manners, and their language,[90] he gave
himself out as a Saniassi, a Brahmin of the fourth and most perfect
class; and, with imperturbable impudence, he asserted that he had come
to restore to them the fourth road to truth, which was supposed to have
been lost many thousands of years before. He submitted to their penances
and observances, which were very painful; abstained from everything that
had life, such as fish, flesh, eggs;[91] respected their prejudices,
and, above all, the maintenance of the distinction of classes. It was
forbidden the catechumen Pariah to enter the same church with the
Sudra or Brahmin converts. All this was the beginning of those heathen
ceremonies and superstitions with which the Christian religion was
contaminated.
Great care was taken by these Roman _Saniassi_ that they might not
be taken for _Feringees_,[92] and still greater care not to hurt the
prejudices of the Hindoos. We might multiply quotations _ad infinitum_
to prove our assertions, but we shall content ourselves with two. “Our
whole attention,” writes Father de Bourges, “is taken up in our endeavour
to conceal from the people that we are what they call _Feringees_; the
slightest suspicion of this would prove an insurmountable obstacle to our
success.”[93] And Father Mauduit writes,—“The catechist of a low caste
can never be employed to teach Hindoos of a caste more elevated. The
_Brahmins_ and the _Sudras_, who form the principal and most numerous
castes, have a far greater contempt for the Pariahs, who are beneath
them, than princes in Europe can feel for the scum of the people. They
would be dishonoured in their own country, and deprived of the privileges
of their caste, if they ever listened to the instructions of one whom
they look upon as infamous. We must, therefore, have Pariah Catechists
for the Pariahs, and Brahminical catechists for the Brahmins, which
causes us a great deal of difficulty.” “Some time ago, a catechist from
the Madura mission begged me to go to Pouleour, there to baptize some
Pariah catechumens, and to confess certain neophytes of that caste. The
fear that the Brahmins and Sudras might come to learn the step I had
taken, and thence look upon me as infamous and unworthy ever of holding
any intercourse with them, _hindered me from going_! The words of the
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account