History of the Jews, Vol. 5 (of 6)Graetz, Heinrich
History
History of the Jews, Vol. 5 (of 6)
Graetz, Heinrich
Jews -- History
"I do not deny that I have noticed in my religion certain human
additions and abuses, such as every religion accepts in course
of time, which unfortunately dim its splendor. But of the
essentials of my faith I am so firmly and indisputably assured,
that I call God to witness that I will adhere to my fundamental
creed as long as my soul does not assume another nature."
He was as opposed to Christianity as ever, for the reason which he had
communicated to Lavater verbally, and which the latter should not have
concealed, namely, that its founder had declared himself to be God.
"Yet, for my part, Judaism might have been utterly crushed
in every polemical text-book, and triumphantly arraigned in
every school composition, without my ever entering into a
controversy about it. Without the slightest contradiction from
me, any scholar or any sciolist in subjects Rabbinic might have
constructed for himself and his readers the most ridiculous
view of Judaism out of worthless books which no rational Jew
reads, or knows of. The contemptible opinion held of Jews
I would desire to shame by virtue, not by controversy. My
religion, my philosophy, and my status in civil life are the
weightiest arguments for avoiding all religious discussion, and
for treating in public writings of truths equally important to
all religions."
Judaism was binding only upon the congregation of Jacob. It desired
proselytes so little, that the rabbis had ordained that any person who
offered to unite himself to this religion was to be dissuaded from his
design.
"The religion of my fathers does not care to be spread abroad;
we are not to send missions to the two Indies or to Greenland,
to preach our belief to remote nations. I have the good fortune
to possess as friends many excellent men not of my creed. We
love each other dearly, and never have I said in my heart,
'What a pity for that beautiful soul!' It is possible for me to
recognize national prejudices and erroneous religious opinions
among my fellow-citizens, and nevertheless feel constrained to
remain silent, if these errors do not directly affect natural
religion or natural law (morality), but are only accidentally
connected with the advancement of good. It is true that the
morality of our actions does not deserve the name, if based
upon error.... But as long as truth is not recognized, as long
as it does not become national, so as to work as powerful
an effect upon the great mass of the people as ingrained
prejudice, the latter must be almost sacred to every friend of
virtue. These are the reasons that religion and philosophy give
me to shun religious disputes."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account