History of the Moorish Empire in Europe, Vol. 2 (of 3)Scott, S. P. (Samuel Parsons)
Islamic
History of the Moorish Empire in Europe, Vol. 2 (of 3)
Scott, S. P. (Samuel Parsons)
Arabs -- Europe -- History; Islamic civilization; Muslims -- Spain -- History; Spain -- History -- 711-1516
As in former ages the progress of the Moslems was retarded and the
stability of their empire endangered and finally undermined by
intestine quarrels, so now, on the other hand, the jealousies and
contentions of the rival kingdoms of Castile and Aragon were destined
to prolong for centuries their struggle for national and religious
supremacy. The intrigues of hostile chieftains, the greed and ambition
of the clergy, the passions of dissolute and unprincipled women, the
unnatural aversion of two nations identical in origin, proud of the
same traditions, professing the same theological dogmas; the prejudices
of the fanatical masses, absolutely controlled by a despotic and
ignorant priesthood, were all-important factors in determining the
policy of the as yet unorganized Christian states of the Peninsula.
The mutual hostility of the kingdoms subsequently united under
Ferdinand and Isabella insured the continuance of Moorish dominion
far more effectually than the levying of contributions, the forming
of alliances, the enlistment of armies. Bodies of Moslem mercenaries
served alternately with the troops of both contending parties, and
those who fought side by side to-day might meet as enemies to-morrow.
Not infrequently impoverished and unscrupulous vassals of the Christian
monarchs were induced to revolt before a projected invasion by the
judicious employment of Moorish gold. Thus arrayed against each other,
with treachery in their camps and foes in their rear, the Spanish
princes were constantly hampered in the execution of their plans of
conquest. Other causes contributed to their want of success. The
Christian generals could often win, but were seldom disposed to improve
a victory. Feudal independence, now first interposed as a disturbing
force, was implacably hostile to discipline; the vassal obeyed his
suzerain; but the noble whose origin was often as illustrious as that
of his king was only too ready to question, or even to defy, the regal
authority. The incapacity to appreciate the resultant advantages of
military success was also a characteristic of the Moors. A great
battle usually ended a campaign. But the enemy was rarely pursued
beyond the field; his camp was overrun by a disorganized mob in search
of plunder; his baggage was ransacked; his seraglio appropriated; his
wounded massacred. The dispersed remnants of his army were afforded
abundant time to reorganize and to again become formidable. The
ability of the Moslems to profit by the discomfiture of an adversary
disappeared with the great soldier Al-Mansur. Generations were to
elapse before the Spanish commanders, recognizing untiring energy as
an indispensable requisite of permanent success, were enabled to plant
their banners on the towers of Cordova and Seville. In no great contest
described in history were such fierce battles fought, such bodies of
men dispersed, such losses of life sustained, and such paltry results
accomplished.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account