History of the Origin, Formation, and Adoption of the Constitution of the United States, Vol. 1: With Notices of Its Principle FramersCurtis, George Ticknor
History
History of the Origin, Formation, and Adoption of the Constitution of the United States, Vol. 1: With Notices of Its Principle Framers
Curtis, George Ticknor
Constitutional history -- United States
Without impeaching the accuracy of Mr. Adams's recollection,
on the score of his age when this letter was written, and
without considering here how or why Mr. Jefferson came to be
the author of the Declaration of Independence, it is believed
that Mr. Adams states other facts, in his autobiography,
sufficient to show that motives of policy towards Virginia
were _not_ the sole or the principal reasons why Washington
was elected general. Mr. Adams states in his autobiography,
that at the time when he observed the professed jealousy of
the South against a New England army under the command of a
Northern general, it was very visible to him "that Colonel
Washington was their object"; "and," he adds, "so many of our
stanchest men were in the plan, that we could carry nothing
without conceding it." (Works, II. 415.) When Mr. Adams came,
as he afterwards did, to put himself at the head of this
movement, and to propose in Congress that the army at
Cambridge should be adopted, and that a general should be
appointed, he referred directly to Washington as the person
whom he had in his mind, and spoke of him as "a gentleman
from Virginia who was among us and very well known to all of
us, a gentleman whose skill and experience as an officer,
whose independent fortune, great talents, and excellent
universal character, would command the approbation of all
America, and unite the cordial exertions of all the colonies
better than any other person in the Union. Mr. Washington,
who happened to sit near the door, as soon as he heard me
allude to him, from his usual modesty, darted into the
library-room." (Works, II. 417.) It is quite clear,
therefore, that Mr. Adams put the appointment of Washington,
in public, upon his qualifications and character, known all
over the Union. He further states, that the subject came
under debate, and that nobody opposed the appointment of
Washington on account of any personal objection to him; and
the only objection which he mentions as having been raised,
was on the ground that the army near Boston was all from New
England, and that they had a general of their own, with whom
they were entirely satisfied. He mentions one of the Virginia
delegates, Mr. Pendleton, as concurring in this objection;
that Mr. Sherman of Connecticut and Mr. Cushing of
Massachusetts also concurred in it, and that Mr. Paine of
Massachusetts expressed strong personal friendship for
General Ward, but gave no opinion upon the question.
Afterwards, he says, the subject being postponed to a future
day, "pains were taken out of doors to obtain a unanimity,
and the voices were generally so clearly in favor of
Washington, that the dissentient members were persuaded to
withdraw their opposition, and Mr. Washington was nominated,
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account