History of the Origin, Formation, and Adoption of the Constitution of the United States, Vol. 2: With Notices of Its Principle FramersCurtis, George Ticknor
History
History of the Origin, Formation, and Adoption of the Constitution of the United States, Vol. 2: With Notices of Its Principle Framers
Curtis, George Ticknor
Constitutional history -- United States
[86] The committee consisted of Gerry, Ellsworth, Yates, Patterson,
Franklin, Bedford, Martin, Mason, Davie, Rutledge, and Baldwin.
[87] The committee was appointed on the 2d of July, and made their
report on the 5th. The Convention in the interval transacted no
business.
[88] See further as to this exclusive power of the House, _post._
[89] Madison, Butler, Gouverneur Morris, and Wilson.
[90] Five States voted to retain it, three voted against it, and three
were divided. This was treated as an affirmative vote. Elliot, V. 255.
[91] Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Delaware, Maryland, North
Carolina, _ay_ 6; Pennsylvania, Virginia, South Carolina, _no_,3;
Massachusetts, Georgia, divided. Ibid. 285, 286.
[92] Gouverneur Morris, Gorham, Randolph, Rutledge, and King.
[93] They gave to New Hampshire, 2; Massachusetts, 7; Rhode Island, 1;
Connecticut, 4; New York, 5; New Jersey, 3; Pennsylvania, 8; Delaware,
1; Maryland, 4; Virginia, 9; North Carolina, 5; South Carolina, 5;
Georgia, 2.
[94] Elliot, V. 287, 288.
[95] This apportionment gave to New Hampshire, 3; Massachusetts, 8;
Rhode Island, 1; Connecticut, 5; New York, 6; New Jersey, 4;
Pennsylvania, 8; Delaware, 1; Maryland, 6; Virginia, 10; North
Carolina, 5; South Carolina, 5; Georgia, 3.
[96] See Mr. Gorham's explanation; Madison, Elliot, V. 288.
[97] Sherman and Gorham.
[98] Of North Carolina.
[99] Massachusetts, Connecticut, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Virginia,
North Carolina, _ay_, 6; Delaware, Maryland, South Carolina, Georgia,
_no_, 4. The votes of South Carolina and Georgia were given in the
negative, because they desired that the blacks should be included in
the census equally with the whites. For the same reason, as we shall
see presently, those States voted against the other branch of the
proposition, which would give but three fifths of the slaves. But upon
what principle, unless it was from general opposition to all numerical
representation, the State of Delaware should have voted with them on
both of these features of the proposed census, is, I confess, to me
inexplicable.
[100] Connecticut, Virginia, North Carolina, Georgia, _ay_, 4;
Massachusetts, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, South
Carolina, _no_, 6. South Carolina voted in the negative, for a reason
suggested in the previous note, _ante_, p. 153.
[101] See the note on the population of the slaveholding and
non-slaveholding States, at the end of this chapter.
[102] See Mr. Jefferson's notes of this debate in the Congress of
1776, Works, Vol. I. pp. 26-30. John Adams's Works, Vol. II. pp.
496-498.
[103] Samuel Chase of Maryland.
[104] See _ante_, Vol. I. pp. 210-213.
[105] See Mr. Madison's notes of the debate in the Congress of 1783,
Elliot, V. 78-80. Journals of Congress, VIII. 188 (April 18, 1783).
_Ante_, Vol. I. p. 213.
[106] See the remarks of General Pinckney, Mr. Mason, Mr. Butler, and
Governor Randolph. Elliot, V. 294-305.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account