History of the Origin, Formation, and Adoption of the Constitution of the United States, Vol. 2: With Notices of Its Principle FramersCurtis, George Ticknor
History
History of the Origin, Formation, and Adoption of the Constitution of the United States, Vol. 2: With Notices of Its Principle Framers
Curtis, George Ticknor
Constitutional history -- United States
[227] That part of the compromise relating to the slave-trade, &c. was
adopted in Convention by the votes of New Hampshire, Massachusetts,
Connecticut, Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, _ay_,
7; New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Virginia, _no_, 4. Maryland,
Virginia, North Carolina, and Georgia voted for a proposition made by
C. Pinckney, to postpone the report, in order to take up a clause
requiring all commercial regulations to be passed by two thirds of
each house. But on the rejection of this motion, the report of the
compromise committee, recommending that a two-thirds vote for a
navigation act be stricken out, was agreed to, _nem. con._; as was
also the clause relating to a capitation tax.
[228] See the note on the American abolition of the slave-trade,
_ante_, Vol. I. p. 460.
[229] See the remarks of John Rutledge. Madison, Elliot, V. 491.
[230] General Pinckney. Ibid. 489.
[231] The point respecting the slave-trade was insisted upon by the
delegates of those three States, both as a matter of State pride and a
matter of practical interest. They regarded the increase of their
slave population by new importations as a thing of peculiarly domestic
concern, the control of which they were unwilling to transfer to the
general government. But they also contended for a political right
which their States intended to exercise. The following table, taken
from the United States Census, shows that in the twenty years which
elapsed from 1790 to 1810 during eighteen of which the importation of
slaves could not be prohibited by Congress, the slaves of those three
States increased in a ratio so much larger than the rate of increase
after the year 1808, as to make it apparent that it was not a mere
abstraction on which they insisted. The right to admit the importation
of slaves was exercised, and was intended to be exercised;--as some of
the delegates of the three States declared in the Convention.
PROGRESS OF THE SLAVE POPULATION FROM 1790 TO 1850, SHOWING THE
INCREASE PER CENT IN EACH PERIOD OF TEN YEARS.
North Carolina. South Carolina. Georgia.
1790 to 1800 32.53 36.46 102.99
1800 to 1810[A] 26.65 34.35 77.12
1810 to 1820 21.43 31.62 42.23
1820 to 1830 19.79 22.62 45.35
1830 to 1840[B] 0.08 3.68 29.15
1840 to 1850 17.38 17.71 35.85
[A] The constitutional power of Congress to prohibit the importation
took effect and was exercised in 1808.
[B] The great diminution in the rates of increase during this period
is probably due to the removal of slaves into Alabama, Arkansas,
Louisiana, and Texas.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account