History of the Origin of Representative Government in EuropeGuizot, François
History
History of the Origin of Representative Government in Europe
Guizot, François
Europe -- History; Representative government and representation
What we observe, then, during the years from 481 to 987, is a
general phenomenon, characteristic of the progress of the human
race. This phenomenon occurs not only in the political history of
societies, but also in every occupation in which the activity of
man finds exercise. In intellectual order, for example, we find
at first that chaos reigns; the most divergent attempts to
resolve the great questions of the nature and destiny of man, are
made in the midst of the universal ignorance. By degrees,
opinions become assimilated, a school is formed, founded by a
superior man; it is joined by almost all men of mind. Ere long,
in the midst of this very school, diverse opinions arise,
contend, and become separated; dissolution begins once again in
intellectual order, and will continue until a new unity is
formed, and regains the empire.
Such, also, is the course of nature herself in her great and
mysterious operations. This continual alternation of formation
and dissolution, of life and death, recurs in all things, and
under all forms. Spirit gathers matter together and gives it
animation,--uses, and then abandons it. It falls a prey to some
fermentation, after which it will reappear under a new aspect, to
receive once more that spirit which alone can impart to it life,
order, and unity.
{103}
Lecture XII.
Ancient institutions of the Franks.
They are more difficult of study than those of the
Anglo-Saxons.
Three kinds of landed property; allodial, beneficiary,
and tributary lands.
Origin of allodial lands.
Meaning of the word allodium.
Salic land amongst the Franks.
Essential characteristics of the allods.
Primitive Institutions Of The Franks.
The primitive institutions of the Franks are much more difficult
of study than those of the Anglo-Saxons.
I. In the Frankish monarchy, the old Gallo-Roman people still
subsisted; they in part retained their laws and customs; their
language even predominated; Gaul was more civilised, more
organised, more Romanised than Great Britain, in which nearly all
the original inhabitants of the country were either destroyed or
dispersed.
II. Gaul was divided among various barbarian peoples, each of
whom had its own laws, its own kingdom, its own history; the
Franks, the Visigoths, the Burgundians; and the continual
alternations of the Frankish monarchy between dislocation and
re-union, long destroyed all unity in its history.
III. The conquerors were dispersed over a much larger extent of
territory; and central institutions were weaker, more diverse,
and more complicated.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account