History of the Origin of Representative Government in EuropeGuizot, François
History
History of the Origin of Representative Government in Europe
Guizot, François
Europe -- History; Representative government and representation
Originally, it does not appear that the Romans ventured to leave
their former inhabitants in the conquered towns. It is said that
violence supplied Rome with women; the same proceeding furnished
her with new citizens. The vanquished, when transferred to Rome,
became Romans like their victors. The conquered town was
occupied, either by soldiers, or by inhabitants of Rome,
belonging to the lowest class of the people, and sent thither to
form a kind of colony. The town of Cœre was the first which, on
being united to Rome, was allowed to retain its own laws and
magistrates after receiving, at least in part, the right of Roman
citizenship. According to Livy, in the year of Rome 365, a decree
of the Senate ordained _ut cum Cœretibus publice hospitium
fieret_.
Admission To Citizenship.
This system prevailed and received continual development. The
conquered towns were united to Rome by receiving the right of
citizenship. Some of them, like Cœre, only received the title of
Roman citizens for their inhabitants, and still retained their
own Senate and laws; others were admitted into the Roman city,
but without obtaining the right of suffrage in the _comitia_
of Rome. With regard to others, again, their political
incorporation was complete; their inhabitants enjoyed the right
of suffrage at Rome like the Romans themselves. These last alone
had a tribe in Rome.
The right of suffrage was granted successively to several towns
which had not received it at first. Finally, all Italy after the
war of the allies, and ere long a portion of Southern Gaul
received the right of Roman citizenship in all its plenitude.
{182}
The towns thus admitted to all the rights of Roman citizenship
were called _municipia_. When the whole of Italy was
invested with these rights, those towns which had not at first
fully possessed them retained for a considerable period the names
of _coloniæ, prefectures_, and so forth, which they had
originally borne; but, in fact, their condition was completely
assimilated to that of the ancient _municipia_.
Out of Italy, the condition of the conquered towns and districts
was still very various. History tells us of _coloniæ_, some
of which were Roman, and others Latin, of _populi liberi_,
_civitates fæderatæ, reges amici, provinciæ_. These
different denominations indicated different modes of existence
under the domination of Rome, and different degrees of dependence
--but these differences successively disappeared. I am referring
merely to the _municipia_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account