History of the Origin of Representative Government in EuropeGuizot, François
History
History of the Origin of Representative Government in Europe
Guizot, François
Europe -- History; Representative government and representation
But the foundation of such a government is the work of ages.
Nations, in their infancy, cannot possess it. The Anglo-Saxon
monarchy was a continual conflict of individual interests, which
was carried on in the Wittenagemot, as well as elsewhere, and its
general tendency was to the continually increasing preponderance
of large landed property.
{49}
Lecture V.
The Wittenagemot; its business and power.
Method of its convocation.
Vicissitudes of its character and importance.
The kingly office among the Anglo-Saxons.
Extent and progress of the royal power.
Business Of The Wittenagemot.
We have already considered the origin and composition of the
Wittenagemot, or general assembly of the Anglo-Saxons, it now
remains for us to speak of its attributes and method of
convocation.
In the infancy of society, everything is confused and uncertain;
there is as yet no fixed and precise line of demarcation between
the different powers in a state; and thus we find that the
attributes of the Wittenagemot were rather indefinite. There was
no settled boundary at which its power ceased, and that of the
monarchy commenced; both united to transact all the business of
the nation, and, if we would ascertain the part actually taken by
the Wittenagemot in this business, we must inquire of history
what were its real attributes.
The defence of the kingdom was the chief business of the national
assemblies. We must not suppose that the obligation of military
service is coeval only with feudalism; independently of every
feudal bond, it was an obligation imposed on every freeman in the
nation, just as at the present day every French citizen is bound
to present himself for conscription. The Wittenagemot ordered
levies of the landowners, who, in their turn, convoked the
freemen resident on their estates.
The Wittenagemot also imposed taxes; at that period, however,
there were hardly any public taxes; the first was levied in
consequence of the Danish invasion, and the law which imposed it
expressly states that it received the consent of all the members
present in the Wittenagemot.
{50}
The county-courts, as we have seen, provided for the maintenance
of the public roads, bridges, and forts. We learn from the
deliberations of the Anglo-Saxon national assembly, that such
matters fell under its cognizance also.
As the right of coining money did not belong exclusively to the
king, but was also possessed by the church and by many powerful
subjects, the Wittenagemot had the oversight of this matter, and
prevented the debasement of the coinage.
We also find it ratifying or annulling those acts of
county-courts which had reference not to private matters, but to
affairs of general importance.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account