History of the Peninsular War, Volume 1 (of 6)Southey, Robert
History
History of the Peninsular War, Volume 1 (of 6)
Southey, Robert
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
same penalty was decreed against every one who should spread news from
the fleet, unless he specified his authority and named the person
from whom his intelligence came. Notice was also given that an office
was opened to receive information against those who were seeking to
emigrate, against the boatmen who would facilitate the escape of such
persons, and against all agents of the English; and it was added, that
on proof of the accusation, Junot would determine what reward should
be given to the informer. ♦OBS. PORT, P. 224.♦ Lagarde had taken
possession of the Inquisition; the old establishment of that devilish
tribunal gave place only to one for political persecution, as if the
edifice itself were polluted, and destined always to deserve the
execrations of mankind.
♦SPECIAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL.
APRIL 8.♦
The next edict announced the formation of a special tribunal for
all criminal cases. It was to consist of a President, who must be a
superior French officer; a French _Capitam Relator_, which may be
rendered Captain-Attorney-General; four other officers, of whom three
must be French, the fourth a Portugueze; one Portugueze judge versed in
criminal jurisprudence; and a secretary, who might be of either nation,
but must speak both languages. Death was decreed against all who
should be convicted of having been engaged in insurrection and popular
commotion, or present at an armed assembly, these offences holding
the first place: the same punishment for murder, either accomplished
or attempted, arson, and robbery accompanied with violence; death
or the galleys for burglary; stripes and the galleys for disobeying
the law respecting the use of knives and other deadly weapons. It is
remarkable, that though the preamble spoke of the insufficiency of
the penal laws, all these punishments were, in the edict, sanctioned
by references to the Portugueze, as well as to the French Code. But
death for the crime of espionage, or for seducing any person to pass
over to the enemy, was enacted by Junot’s own authority. The sentences
of the Tribunal were to be without appeal. In the body of the decree
it was said, that inasmuch as robberies had infinitely multiplied both
in Lisbon and the whole kingdom, this Court should take cognizance of
all offences of that nature, the General in Chief having so decreed
in his desire of protecting with all his power the property of the
inhabitants: but the Tribunal was never embodied; when any persons were
to be _fusiladed_, a military tribunal sufficed for the summary forms
with which these murders were committed.
♦MEASURES OF POLICE.♦
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account