History of the Peninsular War, Volume 1 (of 6)Southey, Robert
History
History of the Peninsular War, Volume 1 (of 6)
Southey, Robert
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
In the partition and invasion of Portugal, the court of Madrid was as
guilty as that of the Thuilleries; but the conduct of the Spaniards
during the invasion was far different from that of their treacherous
allies. The division of General Carraffa, which entered with Junot,
and was under his command, separated from him at Abrantes to secure
Porto, in case the army which was destined for that purpose should be
delayed. This general had acquired the favour of Junot by his exertions
at Alcantara, and had so far profited by his lessons, as to imitate
him at humble distance; raising a contribution of 4000 cruzados at
Thomar, and seizing 10,000 from the depositary at Coimbra; ... but he
was the only Spaniard who thus disgraced himself. ♦NEVES, I. 189.♦ The
force with which he accompanied Junot was little more than 2000 men;
it was doubled by the gradual arrival of reinforcements, and was then
annexed to the division of D. Francisco Taranco, ♦TARANCO TAKES THE
COMMAND THERE.♦ which, according to the convention of Fontainebleau,
should have consisted of 10,000 men, but did not in reality exceed
six, till its number was thus made up. Taranco’s army was formed in
Gallicia, of which kingdom he was Captain-General: he entered on the
side of the Minho, taking the Valença road; and having reached Porto,
issued a proclamation, much in the style of that which Junot had sent
before him, saying that he was come to deliver Portugal from the
disgraceful yoke of England, and assist her in taking vengeance upon
the English for their ferocious treachery toward all the nations of
Europe: fair promises followed of strict discipline and just dealing,
and bloody denunciations of punishment if resistance were attempted.
♦GOOD CONDUCT OF HIS TROOPS.♦ The Spanish general’s conduct was wiser
than his language; his promises were strictly observed, and no crime
was added to that of the iniquitous attack and intended usurpation. He
was, indeed, left at full liberty to act as his own disposition and
principles might incline; for these provinces were, according to the
treaty of Fontainebleau, to be formed into a kingdom for the former
Prince of Parma, as an indemnification for Etruria; and as his consent
had not been thought necessary to the arrangement which was to deprive
him of one kingdom, neither were his instructions for the government of
another.
♦SOLANO AT SETUBAL.♦
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account