History of the Peninsular War, Volume 2 (of 6)Southey, Robert
History
History of the Peninsular War, Volume 2 (of 6)
Southey, Robert
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
As soon as this correspondence was concluded, the rupture of the
negotiation was made known in England, by a declaration which, while
any sense of honour remains in the English nation, may always be
recollected with pride and satisfaction. The continued appearance of a
negotiation, it said, when peace was found to be utterly unattainable,
could be advantageous only to the enemy. It might enable France to
sow distrust and jealousy in the councils of those who were combined
to resist her oppression; and if, among the nations which were
groaning under the tyranny of French alliance, or among those which
maintained against France a doubtful and precarious independence,
there should be any who were balancing between the certain ruin of a
prolonged inactivity and the contingent dangers of an effort to save
themselves from that ruin ... to nations so situated, the delusive
prospect of a peace between Great Britain and France could not fail
to be peculiarly injurious. Their preparations might be relaxed, by
the vain hope of returning tranquillity, or their purpose shaken, by
the apprehension of being left to contend alone. That such was, in
fact, the main object of France in the proposals transmitted from
Erfurth, his Majesty entertained a strong persuasion. But at a moment
when results, so awful from their importance, and so tremendous from
their uncertainty, might be depending upon the decision of peace or
war, he felt it due to himself to ascertain, beyond the possibility
of doubt, the views and intentions of his enemies. It was difficult
for him to believe that the Emperor of Russia had devoted himself so
blindly and fatally to the violence and ambition of the power with
which his Imperial Majesty had unfortunately become allied, as to be
prepared openly to abet the usurpation of Spain. He therefore met the
seeming fairness and moderation of the proposal with fairness and
moderation on his part real and sincere, expressing his just confidence
that the Spanish government, acting in the name of Ferdinand VII., was
understood to be a party to this negotiation. The reply returned by
France to this proposition cast off at once the thin disguise, which
had been assumed for a momentary purpose, and displayed, with less than
ordinary reserve, the arrogance and injustice of that government. The
universal Spanish nation was described by the degrading appellation
of the Spanish insurgents, and the demand for the admission of its
government as a party to any negotiation was rejected, as inadmissible
and insulting. With astonishment, as well as grief, he had received
from the Emperor of Russia a reply similar in effect, although less
indecorous in tone and manner. The King would readily have embraced
an opportunity of negotiation which might have afforded any hope
or prospect of a peace compatible with justice and with honour. He
lamented an issue by which the sufferings of Europe were prolonged; but
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account