History of the Peninsular War, Volume 2 (of 6)Southey, Robert
History
History of the Peninsular War, Volume 2 (of 6)
Southey, Robert
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
Here Palafox and the Aragonese army expected that Castaños would
have rallied, have made a stand, and, acting on the offensive as
circumstances permitted, have saved Zaragoza from a second siege, or
at least have delayed its evil day. They who formed this expectation
did not reckon upon the activity of the enemy, and imputed to their own
government a promptitude and power which it was far from possessing.
Had the defeat of the central army been apprehended in time, and
measures taken for supporting it, one of the first objects would have
been to have strengthened this point. There had been no such foresight.
The French were in pursuit, and orders arrived from Morla, who was one
of the council of war, requiring Castaños to hasten with his army to
the defence of the capital. He consulted accordingly with the chiefs
of division, and they resolved to march by way of Siguenza; from
whence they might either repair to Somosierra, if that strong position
should still be retained, or to Madrid, if such a movement should be
more advisable. In that direction, therefore, they recommenced their
retreat, after one day’s rest.
♦MEASURES OF THE CENTRAL JUNTA.♦
The Central Junta, mean while, was occupying itself with measures ill
adapted to such times. While Blake’s army was fighting, day after day,
without clothing, without food, and without reinforcements to recruit
its ranks, they passed a decree for the establishment of a special
tribunal, to try all persons accused of treason; its object being not
more to bring such as were guilty to deserved punishment, than to
rescue from suspicion and danger those who were unjustly suspected;
for, under the existing circumstances of Spain, they said, the people
having suffered so much from treachery, would naturally suspect all
those whose conduct it did not fully comprehend. The tribunal, which
was composed of members from each of the great councils of state, was
to have a jurisdiction over persons of all ranks: but not to carry
into execution any sentence of death, confiscation, or dismissal from
office, till they laid the whole case before the Supreme Junta. A
certain number of its members might carry on the ordinary business, but
a writ for the arrest of any person, or the sequestration of his goods,
must be issued by the whole. Especial provisions were made to prevent
secret arrest, or long confinement; and the papers of the accused were
not to be detained, as soon as it was ascertained that they contained
no relation to the matter with which he was charged. No proceedings
were to take place upon anonymous information, nor was any informer
to be admitted, who would not consent to let his name be known. The
humanity of these provisions is in such direct opposition to the
practice of the holy office, that it seems to have been the intention
of the framers of this tribunal to render their state inquisition as
unlike as possible to that curse and disgrace of their country. The
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account