History of the Peninsular War, Volume 3 (of 6)Southey, Robert
History
History of the Peninsular War, Volume 3 (of 6)
Southey, Robert
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
The Junta felt it necessary to defend themselves at this time
against the base enemies who charged the late calamities upon their
misconduct, and who were agitating the people of Seville by false
alarms, reporting that the French were within five leagues of that
city, and that the nation was betrayed and sold by its Government. In
reply to these senseless accusations the Junta appealed to the fact,
that in the course of two months it had set on foot two armies for
the defence of the Andalusias, consisting of 50,000 men and nearly
12,000 horse. This they had done beside the assistance which they had
afforded to other provinces; and when was it known that the injuries
which the ship sustains in a storm had been imputed to the pilot? The
Junta had issued an abominable edict, whereby, after denouncing the
punishment of death against all persons who should endeavour to raise
distrust of the existing Government, or to overturn it by exciting
popular commotions, they invited informers to denounce such persons
to ♦TRIBUNAL OF PUBLIC SAFETY.♦ the Tribunal of Public Safety which
they had instituted, holding out the promise of secresy and reward.
When this decree appeared Mr. Frere saw to what an atrocious system
of tyranny it might lead. Judging of the Junta by their individual
characters, he felt assured that they would each have shrunk from
carrying such measures into effect; but he was well aware how little
the personal characters of any men placed in such circumstances are to
be relied on, and apprehended that after some natural hesitation the
majority might either yield to the guidance of one or two members, more
violent and less scrupulous, or abandon themselves to the direction of
this Tribunal of Public Safety; the very name of which, he said, must
remind us of the worst revolutionary horrors. But though the State
Papers of the Junta were on most occasions wiser than their actions,
in this instance their conduct was better than their language; and
it now appeared, most honourably for the national character, that,
notwithstanding this public encouragement to the nefarious practice of
delation, not a single secret information had been laid. If any person,
said the Junta, had complaint to make, or suspicion to allege against
any of the public functionaries, let him lay his proofs before this
Tribunal. But this has not been done, and all the processes which that
Tribunal has instituted have been public prosecutions, not one upon the
accusation of an individual.
♦CORRESPONDENCE ON THE INTRUDER’S PART WITH THE JUNTA.♦
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account