History of the Peninsular War, Volume 3 (of 6)Southey, Robert
History
History of the Peninsular War, Volume 3 (of 6)
Southey, Robert
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
that people quiet, that is, to strike terror into our friends instead
of our enemies? Were our troops, or were they not, welcome to the
people of Spain? He had reason to doubt that fact. He was fearful that
a multitude of Spaniards wished success to Buonaparte rather than to
us. Although we must condemn the injustice of Buonaparte in his attack
upon Spain, yet his measures were extremely judicious. He abolished the
Inquisition, feudal rights, and unequal taxation. This was certainly
holding out some temptation to the people to acquiesce in the changes
which he wished to introduce, and unquestionably it had produced great
effect. The government which England supported was not connected with
any thing like a promise of the reform of any of the evils of the old
system, nor with any thing like a melioration of the condition of the
Spaniards. God forbid that we should abandon their cause while it was
possible to support it with any prospect of success; but he was far
from being sure that the time might not come when we should have to
treat with France after she had totally subdued Spain. Ministers were
justified in refusing to treat on the terms offered at Erfurth; indeed
they must have been the basest of mankind if they had accepted such a
preliminary. But he could not avoid regretting that the country had
lost so many fair opportunities of negotiating a peace, and that it
had at length been reduced to so foul a one that it could not have
been accepted without eternal disgrace. Mr. William Smith said, with a
similar feeling, that though he concurred in the propriety of rejecting
the last offer of negotiation, he by no means meant to declare that the
country ought never to commence another while Spain was in the hands of
the French government.
This first debate made it apparent that the cause of the Spaniards, in
which all Britain had appeared to partake so universal and generous a
sympathy, was now regarded by a party in the state as a party question;
and that because ministers, true to the interest of their country, and
to its honour (of all interests the most important), were resolved to
continue faithful to the alliance which they had formed with Spain,
there were men who felt little concern for what Europe and liberty and
human nature would lose if Buonaparte should succeed in bowing the
Spaniards beneath his yoke, and who looked on with ill-dissembled hope
to the advantage which such a catastrophe might give them over their
parliamentary opponents. Their disposition was more broadly manifested
when the overtures from Erfurth were discussed, and an address moved
approving the answer which had been ♦DEBATES ON THE OVERTURES FROM
ERFURTH. JAN. 26.♦ returned. They admitted that the overtures were
insincere, and could not possibly have led to peace, and yet they took
occasion to carp and cavil at what they could not in common decency
oppose.
♦LORD GRENVILLE.♦
♦LORD AUCKLAND.♦
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account