History of the Peninsular War, Volume 3 (of 6)Southey, Robert
History
History of the Peninsular War, Volume 3 (of 6)
Southey, Robert
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
The Earl of Liverpool remarked, in reply, how singular it was that
every one who censured the plan which ministers had followed with
regard to Spain had a plan of his own, and that none of those plans
should have a single principle of agreement with each other. This at
least, he said, showed the difficulty which government must have felt
in forming its measures, though it afforded a facility in defending
them. As to the accusation of not sending a sufficient force of
cavalry, he stated that as much tonnage was required for 5000 horse as
for 40,000 foot; and moreover that vessels of a different description
were necessary, of which a very limited number could at any time be
procured. Yet from 8000 to 9000 horse had been sent, and there would
have been not less than 12,000, had not the General countermanded the
reinforcements which were ready. Weak as Earl Grey might be pleased to
deem the ministers, they had not been so foolish as to expect that the
first efforts of the Spaniards would meet with uninterrupted success;
they were not yet guilty of calculating upon impossibilities; they had
not supposed that such a cause as the cause of Spain, to be fought for
with such an enemy as the ruler of France, could be determined in one
campaign. Reverses they had met; but those reverses were not owing to
the indifference or apathy of the Spaniards; they were imputable to
their want of discipline, and to an ill-judged contempt for the French,
a proof in itself of their zeal and ardour. And what would have been
the general sentiment in that country and in this if our army had
retired without attempting any thing? If, when after all her repeated
disasters, the spirit of Spain was unsubdued, and her capital bidding
defiance to an immense army at the very gates; if a British army, so
marshalled and equipped, and after a long march to the aid of their
ally, had in that hour of trial turned their backs upon her danger,
what would have been thought of the sincerity of our co-operation? “I
believe in my conscience,” he continued, “that that movement of Sir
John Moore saved Spain. There are some, perhaps, who may be startled
at the assertion: it is my fixed and decided opinion, and as such I
will avow it. After the destruction of Blake’s army, the defeat of
Castaños, and the dispersion of the army of Extremadura, ... after
the capitulation of Madrid, which promised to emulate the glory of
Zaragoza, and would have done so, had not treachery interposed; if
at that crisis Buonaparte had pursued his conquests, by pushing to
the southern provinces, the Spanish troops would never have had time
to rally there. But that time was given by Sir John Moore’s advance
in their favour. Never was there a more effectual diversion. Sir
John Moore himself said, that as a diversion it had completely and
effectually succeeded. Nor was the moral effect of thus re-animating
the spirit of the nation to be overlooked. Let the final issue of the
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account