History of the Peninsular War, Volume 3 (of 6)Southey, Robert
History
History of the Peninsular War, Volume 3 (of 6)
Southey, Robert
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
Antwerp and at Flushing, and it was deemed a British object to destroy
the naval resources of the enemy.
Men in England regarded the commencement of the Austrian war with
widely different feelings, each party expecting a result in conformity
to its own system of opinions. Those journalists who taught as the
first political commandment that Buonaparte was Almighty, and that
Europe should have none other Lord but him, as from the commencement of
the troubles in Spain they had represented the cause of the Spaniards
to be hopeless, so they predicted now that that resistless conqueror
was only called a while from his career of conquest in the Peninsula to
win new victories upon the Danube, after which he would return to the
Guadalquivir and the Tagus, and bear down every thing before him there.
Others, who had too sanguinely expected immediate success from the
Spaniards, with equal but less excusable credulity rested their hopes
now upon Austria, ... there, they said, the battle was to be fought,
and the fate of Spain as well as of Germany depended upon the issue.
The wiser few looked for little from the continental governments,
though they knew that much was possible from the people; but from the
beginning of this new contest, it appeared to them important chiefly
because it effected a diversion in favour of the Spaniards; especially
they hoped that England would seize the opportunity, and by meeting
the enemy upon that ground with equal numbers, secure a certain and
decisive victory.
♦TROOPS SENT TO PORTUGAL.♦
Great and unfortunate as the error was of dividing their efforts, the
Government acted with a spirit and vigour which have seldom been seen
in the counsels of a British cabinet. At a time when they expected
that not Spain alone, but Portugal also, would be abandoned by our
troops, they made preparations for sending thither another army with
all speed, under Sir Arthur Wellesley, who consequently resigned his
seat in Parliament, and his office as Chief Secretary in Ireland. Sir
John Craddock, who had then the command in Portugal, being a much older
officer, was appointed Governor of Gibraltar. ♦EARL OF BUCKINGHAMSHIRE.
APRIL 10.♦ The Earl of Buckinghamshire complained of this, as being
an ill reward for those exertions in collecting the scattered British
force, and preparing it for resistance, to which it was owing that the
determination of embarking from Lisbon was abandoned. This complaint
drew from the Earl of Liverpool a just tribute to Sir John Craddock’s
merits, and some remarks not less just upon the impropriety of
bringing such a subject before Parliament, as at once trenching upon
the prerogative, and virtually destroying that responsibility which
ministers possessed.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account