History of the Peninsular War, Volume 3 (of 6)Southey, Robert
History
History of the Peninsular War, Volume 3 (of 6)
Southey, Robert
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
and national confidence which he has enjoyed; but if he be declared
innocent, it is necessary that the reparation made to his good name be
as solemn and public as the aggression was cruel and scandalous.” These
proceedings satisfied the people, of whom the better sort were grieved
at the excesses which had been committed; and their suspicions against
the Marquis were in some degree removed when Don Felix Jones, to whom
his papers were delivered, declared that no indication of treason was
to be discovered in them.
CHAPTER XVIII.
SECOND SIEGE OF ZARAGOZA.
♦1808. DECEMBER.♦
The Central Junta perfectly understood and truly represented the
spirit of the nation, partaking in some things its blindness and its
obstinacy, but also its exalted feeling, its true heroism, and its
incomparable devotion to the cause of national independence. Its
information concerning the real state of affairs was as imperfect as
its other arrangements. In the correspondence concerning Cadiz, Garay
assured the British Ambassador that Zaragoza was still holding out, not
considering that by little less than miracle that glorious city could
have held out so long, and not knowing that the enemy had then been
eight days in possession of its ruins.
♦CASTAÑOS ACCUSED AT ZARAGOZA AS A TRAITOR.♦
Palafox was not present at the battle of Tudela. He had embarked on
the river just before the action began, little apprehending that it
was so near, and believing that his presence was required at Zaragoza.
This was one cause among the many which led to the misfortunes of that
day; for Castaños, who would otherwise have been with his own troops,
remained with ♦REPRESENTACIONES, &C. DEL G. CASTAÑOS, P. 195.♦ the
Aragonese to supply his place, and each army was thus deprived of
the General who knew the troops, and in whom they trusted. During
the short time that these Generals had acted together, there had
been no want of confidence and frankness between them: but after
their separation, and the refusal of Castaños to throw his troops
into Zaragoza instead of retreating toward Madrid, in obedience
to the orders of the Central Junta, the disasters which had been
sustained were imputed by Palafox to his errors. He had been far from
apprehending, he said, that he should have to prepare for a second
siege; and never could any combination of his own have placed him under
such a necessity. The charge of incapacity against Castaños was more
broadly made in an official account of the action by General O’Neille,
and he was publicly accused of having sold the army and betrayed his
country.
♦STATE OF PUBLIC FEELING IN THAT CITY.♦
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account