History of the Peninsular War, Volume 4 (of 6)Southey, Robert
History
History of the Peninsular War, Volume 4 (of 6)
Southey, Robert
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
was as justly entitled to every distinction which his sovereign had
conferred, and to every honour and reward which it was in the power of
that house to bestow, as any noble lord who for his personal services
had obtained the same distinctions, or who sat there by descent from
his illustrious ancestors.”
To this temperate and able speech, which showed that means had been
taken with due foresight, and that with due perseverance there ♦LORD
GRENVILLE.♦ was a well-grounded hope of success, Lord Grenville replied
by arguing from the misconduct of the Spanish ministers against our
own. “Let the house,” he said, “consider how much dependence the
administration had placed upon such a government as that of the
Spaniards, and then ask themselves if they could be justified in
supporting them in a continuance of error. We were now told that
reliance was to be placed upon the co-operation of the Portugueze; but
they ought to judge of the future from the past, to recollect that for
want of co-operation it had been found necessary to retreat, and that
the remnant of the army was in a situation not unlike that in which it
was placed by its advance to Talavera.”
♦FEB. 1.♦
The vote of thanks was opposed in like manner ♦GENERAL TARLETON;♦ in
the House of Commons. General Tarleton said, that Lord Wellington’s
dispatches were vain-glorious, partial, and incorrect; that he had
been deficient in information concerning the amount and situation of
Soult’s army; and that he had been compelled to a precipitate retreat,
after abandoning his sick and wounded. ♦MR. WHITBREAD.♦ Mr. Whitbread
affirmed, that the battle had been more a repulse than a victory; nor
could he, he said, withhold a tear, when he thought of the British
blood which had been spilt in sacrifice to incapacity and folly. The
consequence of the battle was, that the army had no other retreat than
that through Deleitosa, and their condition during that retreat was
such, that many hundred perished on the road from famine. The Spanish
cause, he concluded, was now more hopeless than ever. But the motion
received a powerful support from Mr. Windham, who, setting all party
views aside, followed the feelings of his own generous nature. “The
unproductive consequences of this victory,” he said, ... “for a victory
it was, and a glorious victory, ... were not to be put in comparison
with the military renown which we had gained. Ten or fifteen years
ago, it was thought on the continent that we might do something at
sea, ... that an Englishman was a sort of sea-animal; but our army was
considered as nothing. Our achievements in Egypt first entitled us to
the name of a military power; the battle of Maida confirmed it; and
he would not give the battles of Vimeiro, Coruña, and Talavera, for a
whole Archipelago of sugar islands.”
♦PENSION VOTED FOR LORD WELLINGTON. FEB. 16.♦
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account