History of the Peninsular War, Volume 5 (of 6)Southey, Robert
History
History of the Peninsular War, Volume 5 (of 6)
Southey, Robert
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
This, he properly observed, was
a position not less perilous to get abroad, than it was false in
itself.... Another member, with indignant feeling, demanded, that when
the capitulation of Badajoz, and the votes of the council of war were
published, there should be added to them a statement of the situation
of Gerona when that city was surrendered. “At Badajoz,” said he,
“nothing has been alleged for surrendering, but that there was an open
breach; nothing was said of want ... nothing of sickness, nor of any
one of those causes which might have justified the surrender. Let then
the soldiers and the nation contrast with this the conduct of Gerona!
Months before that city was yielded, there was not merely an open
breach, but the walls were destroyed; ... the scarcity was such, that
boiled wheat was sometimes the only food; and for the sick, a morsel of
ass-flesh, when it could be had. In this state the governor of Gerona
ordered, that no man, on pain of death, should speak of capitulation.
By this path did they make their way to glory and immortality! The
soldier who would step beyond the common sphere has here what to
imitate. If Badajoz had resisted only four days longer, it would have
been relieved.”
This was a cutting reflection. But though the loss of that city
led to consequences grievously injurious to the allies, and to a
dreadful cost of lives, it did not produce all the evil which Riesco
apprehended; and that its evil effects did not extend thus far, was
owing to the spirit of the Portugueze people, who, unlike General
Imaz and his companions in infamy, had discharged their duty to the
utmost. Treachery, which had done much for France in other countries,
had not been found in Portugal; and popular feeling, which had done
more, was there directed with all the vehemence of vindictive justice
against the most unprovoked, the most perfidious, ♦SKILL AND BARBARITY
OF THE FRENCH IN THEIR RETREAT.♦ and the most inhuman of invaders.
But Massena’s military talents had never been more eminently shown,
and nothing could exceed the skill which was now manifested in all
his dispositions. His columns moved by angular lines converging to
a point, upon gaining which they formed in mass, and then continued
their retreat, Ney with the flower of the army covering the rear, while
Massena so directed the march of the main body, as to be always ready
to protect the rear guard, which whenever it was hardly pressed fell
back, and brought its pursuers with it upon the main army, waiting
in the most favourable position to receive them. This praise is due
to M. Massena and his generals, and the troops which they commanded:
but never did any general or any army insure such everlasting infamy
to themselves by their outrages and abominations, committed during
the whole of their tarriance in Portugal, and continued during their
retreat. Lord Wellington said, their conduct was marked by a barbarity
seldom equalled, and never surpassed: all circumstances considered, he
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account