History of the Peninsular War, Volume 6 (of 6)Southey, Robert
History
History of the Peninsular War, Volume 6 (of 6)
Southey, Robert
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
which ought to have been fought for; nor could he see the shining
character of the Emperor Alexander, who was not, like the Emperor of
the French, personally sharing in the dangers of the war. He could not
subdue the conviction which arose in his mind on viewing all these
things, of the utter impossibility of the Emperor of Russia’s feeling
any exultation whatever: on the contrary, he thought that unfortunate
individual must be oppressed by a view of the irreparable calamities to
which himself and his people had been, and were ♦DEC. 7.♦ likely still
further to be, exposed. Farther than this, when a grant was moved to
the Marquis of Wellington, Sir Francis said, he did not wish to divide
the House upon it, but he wished to move, that the consideration of
the grant should be deferred till some inquiries had been made into
the late extraordinary campaign. Lord Wellington’s victories had none
of the characteristics which distinguished those of Marlborough. It
had been observed, and by military men too, that he had brought his
army into difficulties, but that his men had fought him out of them
again; and that in the capture of the fortresses which he had won, a
waste of life was to be complained of. The cause of Spain appeared to
him infinitely more hopeless than it was at the commencement of the
campaign, ... the case of the Peninsula more deplorable than ever.
♦M. WELLESLEY MOVES FOR A COMMITTEE OF INQUIRY.
MARCH 12.♦
Marquis Wellesley moved for a committee to inquire into the conduct
of the war in the Peninsula. “My Lords,” said he, “what secret cause
amidst the splendid scene that has been exhibited in the Peninsula,
... what malign influence amidst the rejoicings and acclamations of
triumph, has counteracted the brilliant successes of our arms, and has
converted the glad feelings of a just exultation into the bitterness
of regret and disappointment? With an army in discipline and spirit
superior to any that had ever been assembled, uniting in itself
qualities so various, as never to have entered into the composition
of any other such assemblage of force; ... with a general, pronounced
by the whole world to be unsurpassed in ancient or modern times; the
pride of his country, the refuge and hope of Europe; ... with a cause
in which justice vied with policy, combining all that was ardent in the
one motive, with all that was sober in the other; ... with the eyes of
Europe fixed on our movements; ... with the admiration of the world
excited by our achievements: ... how is it that our hopes have been
raised only to be frustrated? How is it that we have been allowed to
indulge in expectation of an approaching completion of success, only
to behold the utter disappointment of our wishes? Why has a system
of advance suddenly and inevitably been converted into a system of
retreat? When victory actually sprung from the bosom of retreat, why
was the glorious victor compelled to relapse into his retrogression?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account