History of the Postage Stamps of the United States of AmericaTiffany, John K. (John Kerr)
History
History of the Postage Stamps of the United States of America
Tiffany, John K. (John Kerr)
Postage stamps -- United States
With the newspaper stamps of the 1865 issue the facts are different.
While they are from the same plates apparently, they can generally be
detected by the color. As the five cents with white border does not
appear in the list of reprints or "specimens" the series was not, after
all, complete, and the possessor of this stamp may feel confident of
possessing an original. The companion five cents with colored border is
exactly of the same color, varying only in different specimens of either
variety in depths of color. The blue of the reprints is of a different
shade, more intense and perhaps the difference can best be expressed by
saying there is a _bloom_ about it that there is not about the
originals. When the two are placed side by side the homely expression
that the "new is worn off" of the originals will serve to express the
difference, though in point of fact they never had the brightness of the
reprints. The same remarks apply to the old and new ten cent values. The
color of the 25 cents, is, however, very badly imitated, the originals
have a yellowish-red cast, the reprint is a dull common red. A very
good idea of it might be had by comparing what are called salmon brick
and pressed brick together. Unfortunately some unscrupulous parties have
"experimented" with the reprints and thus rendered some specimens rather
harder to distinguish, but so far as the observation of the writer goes,
comparison with originals will always satisfactorily expose the
difference.
The extreme anxiety of the Department that the revenue of the service
should not suffer by the use of a private party of an official stamp for
which he had paid the department full value, led as the advertisement
states to the placing of the word "specimen" in small type across the
face, and thereby saved the collector any trouble in identifying
"specimens" from originals, though as the stamps were current the
omission of the gum only reduced them to partly finished stamps, and not
to the category of reprints or counterfeits.
Of the "ordinary stamps for the use of the public," the 5th or 1870
issue was then current, and why ungummed stamps which the circular says
were never the less available for postage, should have been sold when
the Department had a large supply of finished originals at command, is a
mystery to all but official minds.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account